Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-4.1 nano vs Llama 3.1 405B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

41.14/100
Margin
9.8pts
winning →
50.94/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4.1 nano #170 (Estimated); Llama 3.1 405B #107 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-4.1 nano and Llama 3.1 405B share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 10 results are unique to GPT-4.1 nano; 0 to Llama 3.1 405B.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
11
GPT-4.1 nano only
10
Llama 3.1 405B only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-4.1 nano and Llama 3.1 405B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-4.1 nano is priced at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Llama 3.1 405B. GPT-4.1 nano has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Llama 3.1 405B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-4.1 nano and Llama 3.1 405B
CategoryGPT-4.1 nanoΔLlama 3.1 405B
KnowledgeGPT-4.1 nano50.3MarginNo overlapLlama 3.1 405BNot measured
MathGPT-4.1 nano1.0MarginNo overlapLlama 3.1 405BNot measured
Inst. FollowingGPT-4.1 nano83.2MarginNo overlapLlama 3.1 405BNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-4.1 nanoLlama 3.1 405BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-4.1 nano$0.1 input / $0.4 outputLlama 3.1 405B$0 input / $0 outputLlama 3.1 405B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-4.1 nano181 tok/sLlama 3.1 405B29 tok/sGPT-4.1 nano has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-4.1 nano0.63 sLlama 3.1 405B2.19 sGPT-4.1 nano reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-4.1 nano1MLlama 3.1 405B128KGPT-4.1 nano lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoLlama 3.1 405BResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.2%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 17.3%19%Llama 3.1 405B leads
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 63Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoLlama 3.1 405BResult
AA Coding IndexSource 11.1%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 25.9%29.9%Llama 3.1 405B leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoLlama 3.1 405BResult
AA-LCRSource 17.0%24.3%Llama 3.1 405B leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoLlama 3.1 405BResult
MMLUSource 80.1%Not comparable
GPQASource 50.3%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 9.6%8.5%GPT-4.1 nano leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 51.2%51.5%Llama 3.1 405B leads
AA-HLESource 3.9%4.2%Llama 3.1 405B leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -56.4%-17.3%Llama 3.1 405B leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 13.3%22.3%Llama 3.1 405B leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.4%51.0%Llama 3.1 405B leads
Math
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoLlama 3.1 405BResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 1.034%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoLlama 3.1 405BResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 40.1%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1003Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoLlama 3.1 405BResult
IFEvalSource 83.2%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 32.0%39.0%Llama 3.1 405B leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-4.1 nano and Llama 3.1 405B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-4.1 nano and Llama 3.1 405B today?

GPT-4.1 nano: $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens Llama 3.1 405B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026