Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-4.1 nano vs Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
41.1/100
No comparison
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4.1 nano #170 (Estimated); Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) #127 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-4.1 nano and Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 21 results are unique to GPT-4.1 nano; 0 to Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning).

Updated July 28, 2026
Shared results
0
GPT-4.1 nano only
21
Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-4.1 nano and Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

GPT-4.1 nano is priced at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.20 input / $0.20 output per 1M tokens for Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning). GPT-4.1 nano has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning).

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-4.1 nanoMinistral 3 14B (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-4.1 nano$0.1 input / $0.4 outputMinistral 3 14B (Reasoning)$0.2 input / $0.2 outputMinistral 3 14B (Reasoning) has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-4.1 nano181 tok/sMinistral 3 14B (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-4.1 nano0.63 sMinistral 3 14B (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-4.1 nano1MMinistral 3 14B (Reasoning)128KGPT-4.1 nano lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMinistral 3 14B (Reasoning)Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.2%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 17.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 63Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMinistral 3 14B (Reasoning)Result
AA Coding IndexSource 11.1%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 25.9%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMinistral 3 14B (Reasoning)Result
AA-LCRSource 17.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMinistral 3 14B (Reasoning)Result
MMLUSource 80.1%Not comparable
GPQASource 50.3%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 9.6%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 51.2%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 3.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -56.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 13.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.4%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMinistral 3 14B (Reasoning)Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 1.034%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMinistral 3 14B (Reasoning)Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 40.1%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 998Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoMinistral 3 14B (Reasoning)Result
IFEvalSource 83.2%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 32.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-4.1 nano and Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-4.1 nano and Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) today?

GPT-4.1 nano: $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning): $0.20 input / $0.20 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 28, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.