Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data

Data as of October 23, 2026 · How the score is built

EstablishedOpen WeightReasoning

Released Dec 2, 2025256K context

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

Decision readingMinistral 3 14B (Reasoning) is tracked, but not publicly ranked yet. The profile exposes 3 sourced benchmark rows and leaves unsupported fields blank until a published record exists.

Released Dec 2, 2025 — see all recent releases

Decision snapshot

Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.

Capability

Unranked

field median 49.9Not eligible for a public rank

Price

$0.20input / $0.20 output

input median $0.75blended $0.20

Speed

Not measured

field median 93 tok/sTime to first token not measured

Context

256Ktokens

field median 256,000Reported for this model; direct source link not stored

Strongest published evidence

Published rows are visible, but no category has enough eligible evidence for a comparative rank.

Validate before choosing

3 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Independent runtime speed has not been measured.

Source-linked · 3 displayable benchmark rows

Category score record

Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticWeight 22%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
CodingWeight 20%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
KnowledgeRank Not rankedWeight 12%1 benchmarkVerified
63.8
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured
Not measured
MathWeight 5%2 benchmarksVerified
Score pending

3 of 764 tracked benchmark slots have displayable evidence · bars run 0–100

Coverage details

How much of this is verified

Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.

  1. AgenticNot measured
  2. CodingNot measured
  3. ReasoningNot measured
  4. MultimodalNot measured
  5. Knowledge1/1 verified
  6. MultilingualNot measured
  7. Inst. FollowingNot measured
  8. Math2/2 verified
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured

Benchmark ledger

Knowledge opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.

Knowledge1 row
Knowledge benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
GPQAGraduate-Level Google-Proof Q&AScore71.2%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-6 Astra · 96%

Gap24.8 behindWeight3% ref. weight
Math2 rows
Math benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
AIME 2024American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2024Score89.8%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-OSS 120B · 95.8%

Gap6 behindWeightDisplay only
AIME 2025American Invitational Mathematics Examination 2025Score85%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-5.2 · 100%

Gap15 behindWeightDisplay only

Bars run 0–100; the dark tick marks the best source-verified value

All 3 rows

Lineage

The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Each score is estimated for that model; a relative can inform a sparse estimate but never sets a floor, so a newer release can score below an earlier one. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.

  1. Dec 2, 2025 · you are here

    Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)

    Not publicly ranked · $0.2 / $0.2

Spec sheet

Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.

API model ID
Not published
Context window
256K
Maximum output
Not sourced yet
Knowledge cutoff
Not sourced yet
Input modalities
Not sourced yet
Output modalities
Not sourced yet
Parameters
Not sourced yet
Availability
Not sourced yet
Cloud regions
Not tracked yet
Lifecycle
Established
API capabilities
Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
Prompt caching
Not documented in the pricing record
Self-host
Open weights available; hardware estimate not sourced
Rate limits
Not tracked yet

How to read this profile

The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.

We track Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning), but the public leaderboard excludes this profile until enough non-generated benchmark coverage is available. Only published rows appear above.

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) is a open weight model with a 256K context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) sits in the Ministral 3 14B family with Ministral 3 14B. 3 of 764 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.

Last updated October 23, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.

Deployment options

Self-host and provider-specific paths stay separate from benchmark evidence so operating constraints are visible before a score becomes the whole decision.

Published weights are available, but BenchLM does not yet have a sourced parameter and VRAM profile for this exact model. Hardware cost estimates stay unavailable until that sizing record is complete.

Estimate VRAM from known parameters

Questions

How does Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) perform overall in AI benchmarks?

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) has 3 source-displayable benchmark rows, but it does not qualify for a public overall rank. The available rows remain visible by category without being converted into a site-wide score. Missing evidence stays blank instead of being estimated from an earlier model.

Is Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) good for knowledge and understanding?

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) has source-displayable benchmark coverage for knowledge and understanding, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) good for mathematics?

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) has source-displayable benchmark coverage for mathematics, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) open source?

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) is an open-weight model from Mistral. Its weights can be downloaded for local or hosted deployment, subject to the published license. Open weight does not automatically mean open source: training data and training code may remain private, and commercial restrictions can still apply.

Which sibling models are related to Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) belongs to the Ministral 3 14B family. Related tracked variants include Ministral 3 14B. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.

Does Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

No. Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) currently has 3 source-displayable rows. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

What is the context window size of Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning)?

Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) has a reported context window of 256K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.

Watch Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) in the weekly brief

Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 5,600+ readers.

Compare Ministral 3 14B (Reasoning) with every tracked model991 comparisons