Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-4.1 nano vs Soofi S 30B-A3B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

29/100
Margin
16.0pts
winning →
Soofi Project
45/100
1 category wins0 category wins

Evidence parity. GPT-4.1 nano and Soofi S 30B-A3B share 1 comparable benchmark result. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 21 results are unique to GPT-4.1 nano; 7 to Soofi S 30B-A3B.

Updated July 15, 2026
Shared results
1
GPT-4.1 nano only
21
Soofi S 30B-A3B only
7
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick Soofi S 30B-A3B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4.1 nano only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Soofi S 30B-A3B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 45 to 29. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-4.1 nano is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Soofi S 30B-A3B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-4.1 nano and Soofi S 30B-A3B
CategoryGPT-4.1 nanoΔSoofi S 30B-A3B
KnowledgeGPT-4.1 nano50.3Margin 0.4Soofi S 30B-A3B49.9
MathGPT-4.1 nano1.0MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
Inst. FollowingGPT-4.1 nano83.2MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · GPT-4.1 nanoB · Soofi S 30B-A3B
  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 50.3%B 43.4%
    Winner: GPT-4.1 nanoΔ 6.9
    GPQA: GPT-4.1 nano scored 50.3%; Soofi S 30B-A3B scored 43.4%. GPT-4.1 nano wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-4.1 nanoSoofi S 30B-A3BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-4.1 nano$0.1 input / $0.4 outputSoofi S 30B-A3B$0 input / $0 outputSoofi S 30B-A3B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-4.1 nano181 tok/sSoofi S 30B-A3BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-4.1 nano0.63 sSoofi S 30B-A3BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-4.1 nano1MSoofi S 30B-A3B1MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.2%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 17.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 41Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
AA Coding IndexSource 11.1%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench HardSource 3.8%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 25.9%Not comparable
HumanEvalSource 73.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
AA-LCRSource 17.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
BBHSource 78.8%Not comparable
DROPSource 66.5%Not comparable
KnowledgeGPT-4.1 nano wins
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
MMLUSource 80.1%Not comparable
GPQASource 50.3%43.4%GPT-4.1 nano leads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 9.6%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 51.2%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 3.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -56.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 13.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.4%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 43.4%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 51.4%Not comparable
AGIEvalSource 66.9%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 1.034%Not comparable
GSM8KSource 86.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 40.1%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1007Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoSoofi S 30B-A3BResult
IFEvalSource 83.2%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 32.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, GPT-4.1 nano or Soofi S 30B-A3B?

Soofi S 30B-A3B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 45 to 29. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 50.3% and 43.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-4.1 nano or Soofi S 30B-A3B?

GPT-4.1 nano has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 50.3 versus 49.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 15, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.