Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-4.1 nano vs Trinity-Large-Preview

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 15 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

42.06/100
Margin
13.9pts
winning →
55.94/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4.1 nano #161 (Estimated); Trinity-Large-Preview #79 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-4.1 nano and Trinity-Large-Preview share 15 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 6 results are unique to GPT-4.1 nano; 3 to Trinity-Large-Preview.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
15
GPT-4.1 nano only
6
Trinity-Large-Preview only
3
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-4.1 nano and Trinity-Large-Preview is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 15 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Trinity-Large-Preview is priced at $0.25 input / $1.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens for GPT-4.1 nano. GPT-4.1 nano has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 512K for Trinity-Large-Preview.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-4.1 nano and Trinity-Large-Preview
CategoryGPT-4.1 nanoΔTrinity-Large-Preview
KnowledgeGPT-4.1 nano50.3MarginNo overlapTrinity-Large-PreviewNot measured
MathGPT-4.1 nano1.0MarginNo overlapTrinity-Large-PreviewNot measured
Inst. FollowingGPT-4.1 nano83.2MarginNo overlapTrinity-Large-PreviewNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-4.1 nanoTrinity-Large-PreviewComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-4.1 nano$0.1 input / $0.4 outputTrinity-Large-Preview$0.25 input / $1 outputGPT-4.1 nano has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-4.1 nano181 tok/sTrinity-Large-PreviewNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-4.1 nano0.63 sTrinity-Large-PreviewNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-4.1 nano1MTrinity-Large-Preview512KGPT-4.1 nano lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoTrinity-Large-PreviewResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.2%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 17.3%90.1%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
GDPval-AASource 0.0%2.7%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
GDPval-AASource 41554Trinity-Large-Preview leads
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoTrinity-Large-PreviewResult
AA Coding IndexSource 11.1%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 25.9%36.1%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoTrinity-Large-PreviewResult
AA-LCRSource 17.0%33.0%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.9%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoTrinity-Large-PreviewResult
MMLUSource 80.1%87.2%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
GPQASource 50.3%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 9.6%24.5%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 51.2%75.2%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
AA-HLESource 3.9%14.7%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -56.4%-44.2%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 13.3%22.8%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.4%86.6%GPT-4.1 nano leads
MMLU-Pro (Arcee)Source 75.2%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 63.3%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoTrinity-Large-PreviewResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 1.034%Not comparable
AIME25 (Arcee)Source 24.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoTrinity-Large-PreviewResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 40.1%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 10031165Trinity-Large-Preview leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoTrinity-Large-PreviewResult
IFEvalSource 83.2%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 32.0%56.3%Trinity-Large-Preview leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-4.1 nano and Trinity-Large-Preview on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-4.1 nano and Trinity-Large-Preview today?

GPT-4.1 nano: $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens Trinity-Large-Preview: $0.25 input / $1.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.