Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.
GPT-4 Turbo is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 53 to 43. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Pick GPT-4 Turbo if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-4o mini only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
GPT-4 Turbo
47.7
GPT-4o mini
82
GPT-4 Turbo
26.7
GPT-4o mini
87.2
GPT-4 Turbo
75
GPT-4o mini
87
GPT-4 Turbo is ahead overall, 53 to 43. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HumanEval, where the scores are 52 and 87.2.
GPT-4o mini has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 82 versus 47.7. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-4o mini has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 87.2 versus 26.7. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-4o mini has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 87 versus 75. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.