Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-4o vs Llama 3.1 405B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

OpenAI
41.49/100
Margin
10.2pts
winning →
51.71/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-4o #165 (Supported); Llama 3.1 405B #102 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-4o and Llama 3.1 405B share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to GPT-4o; 0 to Llama 3.1 405B.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
11
GPT-4o only
2
Llama 3.1 405B only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-4o and Llama 3.1 405B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-4o is priced at $2.50 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Llama 3.1 405B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-4o and Llama 3.1 405B
CategoryGPT-4oΔLlama 3.1 405B
MathGPT-4o0.3MarginNo overlapLlama 3.1 405BNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-4oLlama 3.1 405BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-4o$2.5 input / $10 outputLlama 3.1 405B$0 input / $0 outputLlama 3.1 405B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-4o131 tok/sLlama 3.1 405B29 tok/sGPT-4o has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-4o0.81 sLlama 3.1 405B2.19 sGPT-4o reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-4o128KLlama 3.1 405B128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-4oLlama 3.1 405BResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 25.1%19%GPT-4o leads
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-4oLlama 3.1 405BResult
AA-SciCodeSource 33.3%29.9%GPT-4o leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-4oLlama 3.1 405BResult
AA-LCRSource 0.0%24.3%Llama 3.1 405B leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-4oLlama 3.1 405BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 11.2%8.5%GPT-4o leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 54.3%51.5%GPT-4o leads
AA-HLESource 3.3%4.2%Llama 3.1 405B leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -10.7%-17.3%GPT-4o leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 19.7%22.3%Llama 3.1 405B leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 37.9%51.0%GPT-4o leads
Math
BenchmarkGPT-4oLlama 3.1 405BResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 0.345%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-4oLlama 3.1 405BResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 864Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-4oLlama 3.1 405BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 34.3%39.0%Llama 3.1 405B leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-4o and Llama 3.1 405B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-4o and Llama 3.1 405B today?

GPT-4o: $2.50 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens Llama 3.1 405B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.