Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.2 vs Soofi S 30B-A3B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

OpenAI
75/100
Margin
30.0pts
← winning
Soofi Project
45/100
1 category wins0 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: GPT-5.2 #25; Soofi S 30B-A3B unranked

Evidence parity. GPT-5.2 and Soofi S 30B-A3B share 1 comparable benchmark result. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 28 results are unique to GPT-5.2; 7 to Soofi S 30B-A3B.

Updated July 15, 2026
Shared results
1
GPT-5.2 only
28
Soofi S 30B-A3B only
7
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick GPT-5.2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Soofi S 30B-A3B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill or you need the larger 1M context window.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

GPT-5.2 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 75 to 45. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.2's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 92.4 against 49.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 92.4% to 43.4%.

GPT-5.2 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $1.75 input / $14.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Soofi S 30B-A3B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. GPT-5.2 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Soofi S 30B-A3B is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Soofi S 30B-A3B gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 400K for GPT-5.2.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-5.2 and Soofi S 30B-A3B
CategoryGPT-5.2ΔSoofi S 30B-A3B
KnowledgeGPT-5.292.4Margin 42.5Soofi S 30B-A3B49.9
AgenticGPT-5.255.7MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
CodingGPT-5.264.7MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
ReasoningGPT-5.252.9MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
MathGPT-5.235.2MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured
MultimodalGPT-5.280.4MarginNo overlapSoofi S 30B-A3BNot measured

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · GPT-5.2B · Soofi S 30B-A3B
  1. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 92.4%B 43.4%
    Winner: GPT-5.2Δ 49
    GPQA: GPT-5.2 scored 92.4%; Soofi S 30B-A3B scored 43.4%. GPT-5.2 wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.2Soofi S 30B-A3BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.2$1.75 input / $14 outputSoofi S 30B-A3B$0 input / $0 outputSoofi S 30B-A3B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.273 tok/sSoofi S 30B-A3BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.2130.34 sSoofi S 30B-A3BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.2400KSoofi S 30B-A3B1MSoofi S 30B-A3B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5.2Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
BrowseCompSource 65.8%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 47.3%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 84.8%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 46.54%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 34.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5.2Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 80%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 55.6%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 53.50%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench HardSource 47.0%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 52.1%Not comparable
HumanEvalSource 73.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.2Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
ARC-AGI-2Source 52.9%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 72.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 11.6%Not comparable
BBHSource 78.8%Not comparable
DROPSource 66.5%Not comparable
KnowledgeGPT-5.2 wins
BenchmarkGPT-5.2Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
GPQASource 92.4%43.4%GPT-5.2 leads
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 42.2%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 90.3%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 35.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -1.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 43.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 79.7%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 43.4%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 51.4%Not comparable
AGIEvalSource 66.9%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-5.2Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
AA AIME 2025Source 99.0%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 40.700%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 18.800%Not comparable
GSM8KSource 86.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5.2Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
MMMU-ProSource 79.5%Not comparable
MathVisionSource 83.0%Not comparable
CharXivSource 82.1%Not comparable
V*Source 75.9%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1229Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5.2Soofi S 30B-A3BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 75.4%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, GPT-5.2 or Soofi S 30B-A3B?

GPT-5.2 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 75 to 45. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 92.4% and 43.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-5.2 or Soofi S 30B-A3B?

GPT-5.2 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 92.4 versus 49.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 15, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.