Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
GPT-5.3 Codex
86
Qwen3.7 Plus
87
Verified leaderboard positions: GPT-5.3 Codex unranked · Qwen3.7 Plus #3
Pick Qwen3.7 Plus if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.3 Codex only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Agentic
+0.2 difference
Coding
+8.0 difference
GPT-5.3 Codex
Qwen3.7 Plus
$1.75 / $14
N/A
79 t/s
N/A
88.26s
N/A
400K
1M
Pick Qwen3.7 Plus if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.3 Codex only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Qwen3.7 Plus finishes one point ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 87 to 86. That is enough to call, but not enough to treat as a blowout. This matchup comes down to a few meaningful edges rather than one model dominating the board.
Qwen3.7 Plus's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 71.1 against 63.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is OSWorld-Verified, 64.7% to 73.3%.
Qwen3.7 Plus gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 400K for GPT-5.3 Codex.
Qwen3.7 Plus is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 87 to 86. The biggest single separator in this matchup is OSWorld-Verified, where the scores are 64.7% and 73.3%.
Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 71.1 versus 63.1. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.7 versus 71.5. Inside this category, OSWorld-Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.