Skip to main content

GPT-5.4 nano vs Grok 4.5

Data verified

Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Verdict

Grok 4.5 leads for most workloads.

  • GPT-5.4 nano is ~10× cheaper on input tokens — the budget pick.

Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.

GPT-5.4 nano

62

VS

Grok 4.5

75

0 categoriesvs1 categories

Pick Grok 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 nano only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoΔGrok 4.5
Agentic42.9 40.483.3
Coding64.7
Knowledge43.8
Multimodal66.1

Operational Comparison

GPT-5.4 nano

Grok 4.5

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0.2 / $1.25

$2 / $6

Speed

191 t/s

N/A

Latency (first answer)

3.64s

N/A

Context Window

400K

500K

Quick Verdict

Pick Grok 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 nano only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Grok 4.5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 75 to 62. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Grok 4.5's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 83.3 against 42.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 46.3% to 83.3%.

Grok 4.5 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.20 input / $1.25 output per 1M tokens for GPT-5.4 nano. That is roughly 4.8x on output cost alone. Grok 4.5 gives you the larger context window at 500K, compared with 400K for GPT-5.4 nano.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, GPT-5.4 nano or Grok 4.5?

Grok 4.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 75 to 62. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 46.3% and 83.3%.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.4 nano or Grok 4.5?

Grok 4.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 83.3 versus 42.9. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 8, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.