Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.4 nano vs Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 13 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

66.79/100
Margin
10.2pts
← winning
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.4 nano #25 (Supported); Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) #76 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.4 nano and Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) share 13 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 16 results are unique to GPT-5.4 nano; 0 to Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning).

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
13
GPT-5.4 nano only
16
Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-5.4 nano and Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 13 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) has the larger context window at 2M, compared with 400K for GPT-5.4 nano.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-5.4 nano and Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning)
CategoryGPT-5.4 nanoΔGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)
AgenticGPT-5.4 nano42.9MarginNo overlapGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not measured
KnowledgeGPT-5.4 nano43.8MarginNo overlapGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not measured
MathGPT-5.4 nano21.0MarginNo overlapGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not measured
MultimodalGPT-5.4 nano66.1MarginNo overlapGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.4 nanoGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.4 nano$0.2 input / $1.25 outputGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.4 nano191 tok/sGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.4 nano3.64 sGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.4 nano400KGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)2MGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning) lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 46.3%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 39%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 56.1%Not comparable
ToolathlonSource 35.5%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 76%65.8%GPT-5.4 nano leads
AA Agentic IndexSource 27.5%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 24.9%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 30.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1100Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 26.10%0.00%GPT-5.4 nano leads
AA Coding IndexSource 56.1%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 46.9%44.2%GPT-5.4 nano leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Result
AA-LCRSource 66.0%64.7%GPT-5.4 nano leads
CritPtSource 9.3%2.9%GPT-5.4 nano leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Result
GPQASource 82.8%Not comparable
HLESource 37.7%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 24.3%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 38.2%27.4%GPT-5.4 nano leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 81.7%84.7%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 26.5%17.0%GPT-5.4 nano leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -29.5%-28.4%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 25.4%22.6%GPT-5.4 nano leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 73.6%66.0%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
Math
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 25.860%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 6.250%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Result
MMMU-ProSource 66.1%Not comparable
MMMU-Pro w/ PythonSource 69.5%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 65.4%61.8%GPT-5.4 nano leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 nanoGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 75.9%50.5%GPT-5.4 nano leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-5.4 nano and Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-5.4 nano and Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) today?

GPT-5.4 nano: $0.20 input / $1.25 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.