Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
60.02/100
No comparison
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.4 Pro #48 (Estimated); Qwen3.7 Flash unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.7 Flash share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 12 results are unique to GPT-5.4 Pro; 0 to Qwen3.7 Flash.

Updated July 27, 2026
Shared results
0
GPT-5.4 Pro only
12
Qwen3.7 Flash only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.7 Flash is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Qwen3.7 Flash yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

GPT-5.4 Pro has the larger context window at 1.05M, compared with 1M for Qwen3.7 Flash.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.4 ProQwen3.7 FlashComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.4 Pro$30 input / $180 outputQwen3.7 FlashNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.4 Pro74 tok/sQwen3.7 FlashNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.4 Pro151.79 sQwen3.7 FlashNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.4 Pro1.05MQwen3.7 Flash1MGPT-5.4 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProQwen3.7 FlashResult
BrowseCompSource 89.3%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProQwen3.7 FlashResult
ARC-AGI-2Source 83.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 30.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProQwen3.7 FlashResult
HLESource 58.7%Not comparable
FrontierScienceSource 36.7%Not comparable
FrontierScience ResearchSource 36.7%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 42.7%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProQwen3.7 FlashResult
IPhO 2025 (Theory)Source 93.5%Not comparable
FrontierMath (legacy)Source 50%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 50.000%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 37.500%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 ProQwen3.7 FlashResult
MMMU-ProSource 94%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.7 Flash on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.7 Flash today?

GPT-5.4 Pro: $30.00 input / $180.00 output per 1M tokens Qwen3.7 Flash: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.