Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.5 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
63.69/100
Margin
5.1pts
← winning
Xiaomi
58.62/100
1 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.5 Pro #38 (Estimated); MiMo-V2.5 #62 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 7 results are unique to GPT-5.5 Pro; 11 to MiMo-V2.5.

Updated July 22, 2026
Shared results
0
GPT-5.5 Pro only
7
MiMo-V2.5 only
11
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick GPT-5.5 Pro if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2.5 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

GPT-5.5 Pro is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 63.69 to 58.62. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.5 Pro's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 90.1 against 65.8.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.5 ProMiMo-V2.5Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.5 Pro$30 input / $180 outputMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.5 ProNot availableMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.5 ProNot availableMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.5 Pro1MMiMo-V2.51MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticGPT-5.5 Pro wins
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMiMo-V2.5Result
BrowseCompSource 90.1%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 62.3%Not comparable
MM-ClawBenchSource 23.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 46.89%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 16.9%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMiMo-V2.5Result
SWE-bench ProSource 56.1%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMiMo-V2.5Result
CritPtSource 30.6%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMiMo-V2.5Result
HLESource 57.2%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 43.1%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMiMo-V2.5Result
FrontierMath (legacy)Source 52.4%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 51.000%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 39.600%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProMiMo-V2.5Result
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source 87.7%Not comparable
CharXivSource 81%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 77.9%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1291Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, GPT-5.5 Pro or MiMo-V2.5?

GPT-5.5 Pro is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 63.69 to 58.62.

Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.5 Pro or MiMo-V2.5?

GPT-5.5 Pro has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 90.1 versus 65.8. MiMo-V2.5 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 22, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.