Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5.5 Pro vs Step 3.5 Flash

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
63.69/100
No comparison
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.5 Pro #38 (Estimated); Step 3.5 Flash #86 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5.5 Pro and Step 3.5 Flash share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 7 results are unique to GPT-5.5 Pro; 0 to Step 3.5 Flash.

Updated July 22, 2026
Shared results
0
GPT-5.5 Pro only
7
Step 3.5 Flash only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-5.5 Pro and Step 3.5 Flash is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Step 3.5 Flash yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

GPT-5.5 Pro is priced at $30.00 input / $180.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.10 input / $0.30 output per 1M tokens for Step 3.5 Flash. GPT-5.5 Pro has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Step 3.5 Flash.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5.5 ProStep 3.5 FlashComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5.5 Pro$30 input / $180 outputStep 3.5 Flash$0.1 input / $0.3 outputStep 3.5 Flash has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5.5 ProNot availableStep 3.5 Flash87 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5.5 ProNot availableStep 3.5 Flash3.03 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5.5 Pro1MStep 3.5 Flash256KGPT-5.5 Pro lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProStep 3.5 FlashResult
BrowseCompSource 90.1%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProStep 3.5 FlashResult
CritPtSource 30.6%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProStep 3.5 FlashResult
HLESource 57.2%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 43.1%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProStep 3.5 FlashResult
FrontierMath (legacy)Source 52.4%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 51.000%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 39.600%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-5.5 Pro and Step 3.5 Flash on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-5.5 Pro and Step 3.5 Flash today?

GPT-5.5 Pro: $30.00 input / $180.00 output per 1M tokens Step 3.5 Flash: $0.10 input / $0.30 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 22, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.