Model comparison
GPT-5.5 vs Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.5 #9 (Estimated); Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. GPT-5.5 and Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 57 results are unique to GPT-5.5; 0 to Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- GPT-5.5 only
- 57
- Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for GPT-5.5 and Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
GPT-5.5 is priced at $5.00 input / $30.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4. GPT-5.5 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | GPT-5.5 | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | GPT-5.5$5 input / $30 output | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4$0 input / $0 output | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | GPT-5.5Not available | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | GPT-5.5Not available | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | GPT-5.51M | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4262K | GPT-5.5 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic24 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 82% | — | Not comparable |
| CyberGymSource | 81.8% | — | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | 84.4% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | 78.7% | — | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | 75.3% | — | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | 55.6% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 93.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 44.9% | — | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | 37.7% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 49.5% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1490 | — | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | 72.93% | — | Not comparable |
| ResearchClawBenchSource | 17.0% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld 2.0Source | 13.0% | — | Not comparable |
| JobBenchSource | 42.7% | — | Not comparable |
| ExploitGymSource | 13.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 1154 | — | Not comparable |
| AA AutomationBenchSource | 42.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | 46.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | 86.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA ITBenchSource | 45.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 31.3% | — | Not comparable |
| terminalBenchHardSource | 60.6% | — | Not comparable |
| aaTerminalBench21Source | 84.3% | — | Not comparable |
Coding9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench ProSource | 58.6% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 82.0% | — | Not comparable |
| Vibe Code BenchSource | 69.85% | — | Not comparable |
| React Native EvalsSource | 84.7% | — | Not comparable |
| cursorBench31Source | 59.2% | — | Not comparable |
| cursorBench32Source | 58.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 74.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 56.1% | — | Not comparable |
| FrontierCode 1.1 MainSource | 43.0% | — | Not comparable |
Reasoning5 benchmarks
Knowledge10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 93.6% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | 93.6% | — | Not comparable |
| HLESource | 52.2% | — | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | 41.4% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 54.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 93.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 44.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 20.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 56.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 85.5% | — | Not comparable |
Math3 benchmarks
Multimodal5 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 75.9% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare GPT-5.5 and Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for GPT-5.5 and Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 today?
GPT-5.5: $5.00 input / $30.00 output per 1M tokens Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.