Head-to-head comparison across 5benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
GPT-5.5
91
Qwen3.7 Plus
87
Verified leaderboard positions: GPT-5.5 #6 · Qwen3.7 Plus #3
Pick GPT-5.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.7 Plus only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Agentic
+9.8 difference
Coding
+12.5 difference
Reasoning
+6.7 difference
Knowledge
+1.5 difference
Multimodal
+10.7 difference
GPT-5.5
Qwen3.7 Plus
$5 / $30
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
1M
Pick GPT-5.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.7 Plus only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
GPT-5.5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 91 to 87. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-5.5's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 81.5 against 71.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 52.2% to 34.7%. Qwen3.7 Plus does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
GPT-5.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 91 to 87. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 52.2% and 34.7%.
Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 67.9 versus 66.4. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 71.1 versus 58.6. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 91.7 versus 85. Inside this category, CritPt is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
GPT-5.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.5 versus 71.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.1 versus 70.4. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.