Model comparison
GPT-5.6 Terra vs Nemotron 3 Ultra
Head-to-head evidence from 22 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5.6 Terra #10 (Estimated); Nemotron 3 Ultra unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. GPT-5.6 Terra and Nemotron 3 Ultra share 22 comparable benchmark results. 3 of 8 categories are comparable. 21 results are unique to GPT-5.6 Terra; 17 to Nemotron 3 Ultra.
Updated July 17, 2026- Shared results
- 22
- GPT-5.6 Terra only
- 21
- Nemotron 3 Ultra only
- 17
- Comparable categories
- 3 / 8
Pick GPT-5.6 Terra if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Nemotron 3 Ultra only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 22 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 3 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
GPT-5.6 Terra is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 72.58 to 60. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
GPT-5.6 Terra's sharpest advantage is in knowledge, where it averages 92.9 against 54.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is BrowseComp, 87.5% to 44.4%.
GPT-5.6 Terra is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.50 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Ultra. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | GPT-5.6 Terra | Δ | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | GPT-5.6 Terra92.9 | Margin← 38.7 | Nemotron 3 Ultra54.2 |
| Agentic | GPT-5.6 Terra87.4 | Margin← 36.1 | Nemotron 3 Ultra51.3 |
| Coding | GPT-5.6 Terra63.4 | Margin← 5.1 | Nemotron 3 Ultra58.3 |
| Reasoning | GPT-5.6 TerraNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra61.9 |
| Math | GPT-5.6 Terra80.8 | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 UltraNot measured |
| Multilingual | GPT-5.6 TerraNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra83.0 |
| Multimodal | GPT-5.6 Terra80.7 | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 UltraNot measured |
| Inst. Following | GPT-5.6 TerraNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Ultra81.7 |
Decisive benchmark drivers
The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.
More
- Source ↗
BrowseComp
AgenticA 87.5%B 44.4%Winner: GPT-5.6 TerraΔ 43.1BrowseComp: GPT-5.6 Terra scored 87.5%; Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 44.4%. GPT-5.6 Terra wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
Terminal-Bench 2.0
AgenticA 87.4%B 56.4%Winner: GPT-5.6 TerraΔ 31Terminal-Bench 2.0: GPT-5.6 Terra scored 87.4%; Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 56.4%. GPT-5.6 Terra wins this benchmark. - Source ↗
GPQA
KnowledgeA 92.9%B 87%Winner: GPT-5.6 TerraΔ 5.9GPQA: GPT-5.6 Terra scored 92.9%; Nemotron 3 Ultra scored 87%. GPT-5.6 Terra wins this benchmark.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | GPT-5.6 Terra | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | GPT-5.6 Terra$2.5 input / $15 output | Nemotron 3 Ultra$0 input / $0 output | Nemotron 3 Ultra has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | GPT-5.6 TerraNot available | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | GPT-5.6 TerraNot available | Nemotron 3 UltraNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | GPT-5.6 Terra1M | Nemotron 3 Ultra1M | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
AgenticGPT-5.6 Terra wins19 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Terra | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 87.4% | 56.4% | GPT-5.6 Terra leads |
| BrowseCompSource | 87.5% | 44.4% | GPT-5.6 Terra leads |
| OSWorld 2.0Source | 50.2% | — | Not comparable |
| CyberGymSource | 81.8% | — | Not comparable |
| ExploitGymSource | 23.2% | — | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | 53.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 47.4% | 27.4% | GPT-5.6 Terra leads |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 86.3% | 83.3% | GPT-5.6 Terra leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 54.6% | 33.2% | GPT-5.6 Terra leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 1593 | 1164 | GPT-5.6 Terra leads |
| AA Harvey LABSource | 2.5% | 3.3% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| AA ITBenchSource | 51.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 31.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA AutomationBenchSource | 45.6% | — | Not comparable |
| PinchBenchSource | — | 90.0% | Not comparable |
| τ³-bench resultsSource | — | 70.9% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/ toolsSource | — | 37.4% | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 870 | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | — | 28.9% | Not comparable |
CodingGPT-5.6 Terra wins13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Terra | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench ProSource | 63.4% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 87.4% | 56.4% | GPT-5.6 Terra leads |
| deepSweSource | 69.6% | — | Not comparable |
| FrontierCode 1.1 ExtendedSource | 55.8% | — | Not comparable |
| cursorBench32Source | 64.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 76.7% | 49.3% | GPT-5.6 Terra leads |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | 57.6% | 36.4% | GPT-5.6 Terra leads |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 53.9% | 39.9% | GPT-5.6 Terra leads |
| AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Source | 88.0% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 71.9% | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 67.7% | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBench v6Source | — | 89.0% | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | — | 44.6% | Not comparable |
Reasoning4 benchmarks
KnowledgeGPT-5.6 Terra wins14 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Terra | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 92.9% | 87% | GPT-5.6 Terra leads |
| GPQA-DSource | 92.9% | 87.0% | GPT-5.6 Terra leads |
| HealthBench ProfessionalSource | 57.7% | — | Not comparable |
| HealthBench HardSource | 32.7% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 55.0% | 37.8% | GPT-5.6 Terra leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 92.5% | 86.7% | GPT-5.6 Terra leads |
| AA-HLESource | 41.8% | 26.6% | GPT-5.6 Terra leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -0.2% | -0.8% | GPT-5.6 Terra leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 45.9% | 21.6% | GPT-5.6 Terra leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 85.2% | 28.5% | Nemotron 3 Ultra leads |
| HLESource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 26.7% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 86.8% | Not comparable |
| AA Openness IndexSource | — | 83.3% | Not comparable |
Math3 benchmarks
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Terra | Nemotron 3 Ultra | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU-ProXSource | — | 83% | Not comparable |
Multimodal4 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (4)
Which is better, GPT-5.6 Terra or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
GPT-5.6 Terra is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 72.58 to 60. The biggest single separator in this matchup is BrowseComp, where the scores are 87.5% and 44.4%.
Which is better for knowledge tasks, GPT-5.6 Terra or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
GPT-5.6 Terra has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 92.9 versus 54.2. Inside this category, AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for coding, GPT-5.6 Terra or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
GPT-5.6 Terra has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 63.4 versus 58.3. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Which is better for agentic tasks, GPT-5.6 Terra or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
GPT-5.6 Terra has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 87.4 versus 51.3. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.