Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5 (high) vs Llama 4 Scout

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 17 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

58.61/100
Margin
18.7pts
← winning
39.87/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5 (high) #63 (Estimated); Llama 4 Scout #174 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5 (high) and Llama 4 Scout share 17 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to GPT-5 (high); 1 to Llama 4 Scout.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
17
GPT-5 (high) only
3
Llama 4 Scout only
1
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-5 (high) and Llama 4 Scout is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 17 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-5 (high) is priced at $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Llama 4 Scout. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window at 10M, compared with 128K for GPT-5 (high).

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5 (high)Llama 4 ScoutComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5 (high)$1.25 input / $10 outputLlama 4 Scout$0 input / $0 outputLlama 4 Scout has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5 (high)83 tok/sLlama 4 Scout128 tok/sLlama 4 Scout has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5 (high)36.28 sLlama 4 Scout0.70 sLlama 4 Scout reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5 (high)128KLlama 4 Scout10MLlama 4 Scout lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5 (high)Llama 4 ScoutResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 25.7%1.1%GPT-5 (high) leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 84.8%15.5%GPT-5 (high) leads
GDPval-AASource 28.7%0.0%GPT-5 (high) leads
GDPval-AASource 107590GPT-5 (high) leads
JobBenchSource 8.5%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5 (high)Llama 4 ScoutResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 20.09%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 37.8%8.2%GPT-5 (high) leads
AA-SciCodeSource 42.9%17.0%GPT-5 (high) leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5 (high)Llama 4 ScoutResult
AA-LCRSource 75.6%25.8%GPT-5 (high) leads
CritPtSource 5.7%0.0%GPT-5 (high) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5 (high)Llama 4 ScoutResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 34.7%10.0%GPT-5 (high) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 85.4%58.7%GPT-5 (high) leads
AA-HLESource 26.5%4.3%GPT-5 (high) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -8.1%-52.4%GPT-5 (high) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 40.7%14.6%GPT-5 (high) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 82.1%78.3%Llama 4 Scout leads
Math
BenchmarkGPT-5 (high)Llama 4 ScoutResult
AA MATH-500Source 99.4%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 0.000%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5 (high)Llama 4 ScoutResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 74.2%52.9%GPT-5 (high) leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1217783GPT-5 (high) leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5 (high)Llama 4 ScoutResult
AA-IFBenchSource 73.1%39.5%GPT-5 (high) leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-5 (high) and Llama 4 Scout on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-5 (high) and Llama 4 Scout today?

GPT-5 (high): $1.25 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens Llama 4 Scout: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GPT-5 (high)
API / mo$8,438
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Llama 4 Scout
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$2,278
Break-even
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.