Capability
59.6/100
field median 59.1
#80 of 230 ranked models
Five or fewer confirmed AI changes, with original sources, on mornings when something changed.A free source-linked morning brief.
See the free Radar BriefReleased Aug 7, 2025 — see all recent releases
Data as of September 2, 2026 · How the score is built
Agentic ranks #60. Particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
2 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty.
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Capability
59.6/100
field median 59.1
#80 of 230 ranked models
Price
$1.25input / $10 output
input median $1
blended $5.63
Speed
76tok/s
field median 90 tok/s
First token 1.26 s
Context
400Ktokens
field median 256,000
Reported for this model; direct source link not stored
Each axis shows percentile within that category’s eligible cohort. The comparison outline is the median of the six nearest public-score peers; a collapsed vertex means the category is not rank-eligible.
GPT-5 (high) category percentile values
The dashed outline is median of 6 nearest peers.
Published API price against the public score. The x-axis uses a log scale; the dashed path marks models that are not beaten by a cheaper, higher-scoring option. Price uses average of published input and output rates.
The chart opens on the current model. Scroll horizontally to inspect the full price axis.
Horizontal: blended price per million tokens, log scale · Vertical: public score
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank #60 of 143Percentile 58thWeight 22%1 benchmarkVerified | 51.4 | #60 of 143 | 58th | 22% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| CodingRank Not rankedWeight 20%1 benchmarkVerified | 63.5 | Not ranked | Not available | 20% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vibe Code BenchVibe Code Bench v1.1 | Score20.09% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 4.7 · 71.00% | Gap50.9 behind | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JobBench | Score8.5% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Muse Spark 1.3 · 64.9% | Gap56.4 behind | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. A successor's displayed score stays at least 0.1 points above its predecessor; raw benchmark rows do not move. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Aug 7, 2025 · you are here
GPT-5 (high)Score 59.6 · $1.25 / $10
reasoning · high
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
GPT-5 (high) ranks #80 of 230 on the public leaderboard with a score of 59.63/100. It does not yet have enough sourced coverage for a verified position.
GPT-5 (high) is a proprietary model with a 400K context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
GPT-5 (high) sits in the GPT-5 family with GPT-5 (medium), GPT-5 mini, GPT-5 nano. 2 of 416 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Its strongest eligible category is Agentic at #60. particularly useful for coding agents, browser research, and computer-use workflows.
GPT-5 (high) ranks #80 out of 230 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 59.63/100. Its evidence status is Estimated, and this profile shows 2 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.
GPT-5 (high) has source-displayable benchmark coverage for coding and programming, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
GPT-5 (high) ranks #60 out of 143 eligible models for agentic tool use and computer tasks, with a public category score of 51.4/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
GPT-5 (high) belongs to the GPT-5 family. Related tracked variants include GPT-5 (medium), GPT-5 mini, GPT-5 nano. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.
No. GPT-5 (high) currently has 20 source-displayable rows across 416 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
GPT-5 (high) has a reported context window of 400K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.
Related resources
Last updated September 2, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.