Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5 (medium) vs Inkling

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 10 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

55.1/100
Margin
16.9pts
winning →
Thinking Machines Lab
72/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Verified leaderboard positions: GPT-5 (medium) unranked; Inkling #17

BenchAlign evidence: GPT-5 (medium) supported; Inkling not scored. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5 (medium) and Inkling share 10 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to GPT-5 (medium); 22 to Inkling.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
10
GPT-5 (medium) only
5
Inkling only
22
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-5 (medium) and Inkling is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 10 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Inkling has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for GPT-5 (medium).

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-5 (medium) and Inkling
CategoryGPT-5 (medium)ΔInkling
AgenticGPT-5 (medium)Not measuredMarginNo overlapInkling69.4
CodingGPT-5 (medium)Not measuredMarginNo overlapInkling68.6
KnowledgeGPT-5 (medium)Not measuredMarginNo overlapInkling51.7
MathGPT-5 (medium)Not measuredMarginNo overlapInkling97.1
MultimodalGPT-5 (medium)Not measuredMarginNo overlapInkling76.5
Inst. FollowingGPT-5 (medium)Not measuredMarginNo overlapInkling79.8

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5 (medium)InklingComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5 (medium)Not availableInkling$1.87 input / $4.68 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5 (medium)83 tok/sInklingNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5 (medium)36.28 sInklingNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5 (medium)128KInkling1MInkling lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5 (medium)InklingResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 86.5%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 63.8%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 77.1%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 74.1%Not comparable
Design Arena Agentic Web DevSource 1258Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 32.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 36.9%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1239Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource 836Not comparable
AA Tau3 BankingSource 23.7%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5 (medium)InklingResult
Terminal-Bench HardSource 37.9%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 41.1%46.1%Inkling leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 77.6%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 54.3%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 63.8%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 52.1%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5 (medium)InklingResult
AA-LCRSource 72.8%63.3%GPT-5 (medium) leads
CritPtSource 0.0%5.4%Inkling leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5 (medium)InklingResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 33.7%40.7%Inkling leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 84.2%87.2%Inkling leads
AA-HLESource 23.5%29.7%Inkling leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -10.1%2.1%Inkling leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 38.9%40.0%Inkling leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.1%63.1%Inkling leads
GPQASource 87.9%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 87.9%Not comparable
HLESource 46%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 30%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-5 (medium)InklingResult
AA MATH-500Source 99.1%Not comparable
AIME26Source 97.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5 (medium)InklingResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 74.3%73.5%GPT-5 (medium) leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1219Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 73.5%Not comparable
CharXivSource 82%Not comparable
CharXiv w/o toolsSource 78.1%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5 (medium)InklingResult
AA-IFBenchSource 70.6%Not comparable
IFBenchSource 79.8%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-5 (medium) and Inkling on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-5 (medium) and Inkling today?

GPT-5 (medium): Pricing unavailable Inkling: $1.87 input / $4.68 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.