Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-5 nano vs Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
N/A
No comparison
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-5 nano #139 (Estimated); Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) #76 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-5 nano and Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to GPT-5 nano; 13 to Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning).

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
0
GPT-5 nano only
0
Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) only
13
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-5 nano and Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for GPT-5 nano yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) has the larger context window at 2M, compared with 400K for GPT-5 nano.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-5 nanoGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-5 nano$0.05 input / $0.4 outputGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-5 nano137 tok/sGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-5 nano83.30 sGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-5 nano400KGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)2MGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning) lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-5 nanoGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 65.8%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-5 nanoGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 0.00%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 44.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-5 nanoGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Result
AA-LCRSource 64.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 2.9%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-5 nanoGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 27.4%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 84.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 17.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -28.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 22.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 66.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-5 nanoGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 61.8%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-5 nanoGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 50.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-5 nano and Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-5 nano and Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) today?

GPT-5 nano: $0.05 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.