Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-OSS 120B vs Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 18 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

50.08/100
Margin
9.3pts
winning →
59.35/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-OSS 120B #116 (Supported); Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) #57 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-OSS 120B and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) share 18 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 9 results are unique to GPT-OSS 120B; 9 to Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning).

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
18
GPT-OSS 120B only
9
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) only
9
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-OSS 120B and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 18 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) is priced at $0.60 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for GPT-OSS 120B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for GPT-OSS 120B and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
CategoryGPT-OSS 120BΔKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
AgenticGPT-OSS 120BNot measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)55.0
CodingGPT-OSS 120BNot measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)76.8
KnowledgeGPT-OSS 120BNot measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)87.2
MultimodalGPT-OSS 120BNot measuredMarginNo overlapKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)78.5

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-OSS 120BKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-OSS 120B$0 input / $0 outputKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)$0.6 input / $3 outputGPT-OSS 120B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-OSS 120B262 tok/sKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-OSS 120B0.79 sKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-OSS 120B128KKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-OSS 120BKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 13.2%21.7%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
APEX-Agents-AASource 3.1%11.5%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
τ²-bench resultsSource 65.8%95.9%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
GDPval-AASource 15.0%25.4%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
GDPval-AASource 7991009Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
Gert LabsSource 29.61%32.58%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource 25.5%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource 0.0%Not comparable
AA ITBenchSource 5.6%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 50.8%Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 60.6%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-OSS 120BKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
React Native EvalsSource 71.6%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 30.4%46.8%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-SciCodeSource 38.9%49.0%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA LiveCodeBenchSource 87.8%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 76.8%Not comparable
Vibe Code BenchSource 17.54%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-OSS 120BKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA-LCRSource 50.7%65.3%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
CritPtSource 1.1%3.1%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-OSS 120BKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 23.8%35.4%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 78.2%87.9%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 18.5%29.4%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -50.0%-8.1%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 21.5%34.3%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 91.2%64.6%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
AA Openness IndexSource 38.9%Not comparable
AA MMLU-ProSource 80.8%Not comparable
GPQASource 87.6%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 87.1%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGPT-OSS 120BKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA AIME 2025Source 93.4%Not comparable
AIME 2025Source 96.1%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkGPT-OSS 120BKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource 82.8%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-OSS 120BKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 10001282Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
MMMU-ProSource 78.5%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 75.4%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-OSS 120BKimi K2.5 (Reasoning)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 69.0%70.2%Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-OSS 120B and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-OSS 120B and Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) today?

GPT-OSS 120B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning): $0.60 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.