Skip to main content

Model comparison

GPT-OSS 20B vs Llama 4 Scout

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 16 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

42.74/100
Margin
2.9pts
← winning
39.87/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: GPT-OSS 20B #159 (Supported); Llama 4 Scout #174 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. GPT-OSS 20B and Llama 4 Scout share 16 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to GPT-OSS 20B; 2 to Llama 4 Scout.

Updated July 22, 2026
Shared results
16
GPT-OSS 20B only
2
Llama 4 Scout only
2
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for GPT-OSS 20B and Llama 4 Scout is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 16 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window at 10M, compared with 128K for GPT-OSS 20B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGPT-OSS 20BLlama 4 ScoutComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGPT-OSS 20B$0 input / $0 outputLlama 4 Scout$0 input / $0 outputListed prices are equal.
Generation speedtokens per secondGPT-OSS 20B313 tok/sLlama 4 Scout128 tok/sGPT-OSS 20B has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGPT-OSS 20B0.65 sLlama 4 Scout0.70 sGPT-OSS 20B reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGPT-OSS 20B128KLlama 4 Scout10MLlama 4 Scout lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGPT-OSS 20BLlama 4 ScoutResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 3.1%1.1%GPT-OSS 20B leads
APEX-Agents-AASource 0.7%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 60.2%15.5%GPT-OSS 20B leads
GDPval-AASource 3.0%0.0%GPT-OSS 20B leads
GDPval-AASource 55990GPT-OSS 20B leads
Coding
BenchmarkGPT-OSS 20BLlama 4 ScoutResult
React Native EvalsSource 71%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 20.7%8.2%GPT-OSS 20B leads
AA-SciCodeSource 34.4%17.0%GPT-OSS 20B leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkGPT-OSS 20BLlama 4 ScoutResult
AA-LCRSource 30.7%25.8%GPT-OSS 20B leads
CritPtSource 1.4%0.0%GPT-OSS 20B leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGPT-OSS 20BLlama 4 ScoutResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 14.9%10.0%GPT-OSS 20B leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 68.8%58.7%GPT-OSS 20B leads
AA-HLESource 9.8%4.3%GPT-OSS 20B leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -63.9%-52.4%Llama 4 Scout leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 15.5%14.6%GPT-OSS 20B leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 94.1%78.3%Llama 4 Scout leads
Math
BenchmarkGPT-OSS 20BLlama 4 ScoutResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 0.000%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGPT-OSS 20BLlama 4 ScoutResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 882780GPT-OSS 20B leads
AA-MMMU-ProSource 52.9%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGPT-OSS 20BLlama 4 ScoutResult
AA-IFBenchSource 65.1%39.5%GPT-OSS 20B leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare GPT-OSS 20B and Llama 4 Scout on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for GPT-OSS 20B and Llama 4 Scout today?

GPT-OSS 20B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Llama 4 Scout: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

GPT-OSS 20B
API / mo$0
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Llama 4 Scout
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$2,278
Break-even
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 22, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.