Skip to main content

Model comparison

Granite-4.0-H-350M vs Holo3-35B-A3B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Benchmark data for one or both models is coming soon. This page currently shows metadata and pricing where BenchLM has it, and score-level comparisons will populate as public benchmark results land.
Margin
48.0pts
winning →
H Company
74/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Evidence parity. Granite-4.0-H-350M and Holo3-35B-A3B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 12 results are unique to Granite-4.0-H-350M; 1 to Holo3-35B-A3B.

Updated July 14, 2026
Shared results
0
Granite-4.0-H-350M only
12
Holo3-35B-A3B only
1
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Granite-4.0-H-350M and Holo3-35B-A3B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Holo3-35B-A3B has the larger context window at 64K, compared with 32K for Granite-4.0-H-350M.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGranite-4.0-H-350MHolo3-35B-A3BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGranite-4.0-H-350M$0 input / $0 outputHolo3-35B-A3BNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGranite-4.0-H-350MNot availableHolo3-35B-A3BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGranite-4.0-H-350MNot availableHolo3-35B-A3BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGranite-4.0-H-350M32KHolo3-35B-A3B64KHolo3-35B-A3B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGranite-4.0-H-350MHolo3-35B-A3BResult
Tau2-TelecomSource 14.6%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 82.6%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGranite-4.0-H-350MHolo3-35B-A3BResult
Terminal-Bench HardSource 0.0%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 1.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGranite-4.0-H-350MHolo3-35B-A3BResult
AA-LCRSource 0.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGranite-4.0-H-350MHolo3-35B-A3BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 1.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 25.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 6.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -87.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 3.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 94.4%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGranite-4.0-H-350MHolo3-35B-A3BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 17.6%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Granite-4.0-H-350M and Holo3-35B-A3B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Granite-4.0-H-350M and Holo3-35B-A3B today?

Granite-4.0-H-350M: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Holo3-35B-A3B: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 14, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.