Skip to main content

Model comparison

Grok 3 [Beta] vs o1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

39.82/100
Margin
7.6pts
winning →
OpenAI
47.39/100
0 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Grok 3 [Beta] #179 (Supported); o1 #137 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Grok 3 [Beta] and o1 share 1 comparable benchmark result. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Grok 3 [Beta]; 15 to o1.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
1
Grok 3 [Beta] only
1
o1 only
15
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick o1 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Grok 3 [Beta] only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

o1 is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 47.39 to 39.82. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

o1's sharpest advantage is in mathematics, where it averages 9.3 against 2.8. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3), 3.793% to 9.310%.

o1 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Grok 3 [Beta] is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. o1 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Grok 3 [Beta].

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Grok 3 [Beta] and o1
CategoryGrok 3 [Beta]Δo1
MathGrok 3 [Beta]2.8Margin 6.5o19.3
KnowledgeGrok 3 [Beta]Not measuredMarginNo overlapo175.7
Inst. FollowingGrok 3 [Beta]Not measuredMarginNo overlapo192.2

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Grok 3 [Beta]B · o1
  1. FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)

    Math
    Source ↗
    A 3.793%B 9.310%
    Winner: o1Δ 5.5
    FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3): Grok 3 [Beta] scored 3.793%; o1 scored 9.310%. o1 wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGrok 3 [Beta]o1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGrok 3 [Beta]Not availableo1$15 input / $60 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGrok 3 [Beta]Not availableo198 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGrok 3 [Beta]Not availableo132.29 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGrok 3 [Beta]128Ko1200Ko1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGrok 3 [Beta]o1Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 62.6%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGrok 3 [Beta]o1Result
AA Coding IndexSource 39.7%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 35.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGrok 3 [Beta]o1Result
AA-LCRSource 59.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.3%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGrok 3 [Beta]o1Result
MMLUSource 91.8%Not comparable
GPQASource 75.7%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 23.4%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 74.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 7.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -10.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 34.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 69.3%Not comparable
Matho1 wins
BenchmarkGrok 3 [Beta]o1Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 3.793%9.310%o1 leads
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 0.000%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGrok 3 [Beta]o1Result
IFEvalSource 92.2%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 70.3%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Grok 3 [Beta] or o1?

o1 is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 47.39 to 39.82. The biggest single separator in this matchup is FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3), where the scores are 3.793% and 9.310%.

Which is better for math, Grok 3 [Beta] or o1?

o1 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 9.3 versus 2.8. Inside this category, FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026