Skip to main content

Model comparison

Grok 3 [Beta] vs Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

40.43/100
Margin
17.6pts
winning →
0 category wins1 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Grok 3 [Beta] #171 (Supported); Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) #66 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Grok 3 [Beta] and Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) share 2 comparable benchmark results. 1 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Grok 3 [Beta]; 0 to Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning).

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
2
Grok 3 [Beta] only
0
Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) only
0
Comparable categories
1 / 8

Pick Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Grok 3 [Beta] only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 1 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 58.01 to 40.43. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)'s sharpest advantage is in mathematics, where it averages 6.4 against 2.8. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3), 3.793% to 8.481%.

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) is the reasoning model in the pair, while Grok 3 [Beta] is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Grok 3 [Beta] and Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)
CategoryGrok 3 [Beta]ΔQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)
MathGrok 3 [Beta]2.8Margin 3.6Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)6.4

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Grok 3 [Beta]B · Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)
  1. FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)

    Math
    Source ↗
    A 3.793%B 8.481%
    Winner: Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Δ 4.7
    FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3): Grok 3 [Beta] scored 3.793%; Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) scored 8.481%. Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGrok 3 [Beta]Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGrok 3 [Beta]Not availableQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGrok 3 [Beta]Not availableQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGrok 3 [Beta]Not availableQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGrok 3 [Beta]128KQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)128KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

MathQwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) wins
BenchmarkGrok 3 [Beta]Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 3.793%8.481%Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) leads
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 0.000%0.000%Tie
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Which is better, Grok 3 [Beta] or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 58.01 to 40.43. The biggest single separator in this matchup is FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3), where the scores are 3.793% and 8.481%.

Which is better for math, Grok 3 [Beta] or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 6.4 versus 2.8. Inside this category, FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.