Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Qwen2.5-1M is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 43 to 23. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Qwen2.5-1M's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 79.9 against 21.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SimpleQA, 21.7% to 81%.
Qwen2.5-1M gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Grok 3 Mini.
Pick Qwen2.5-1M if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Grok 3 Mini only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Grok 3 Mini
41.5
Qwen2.5-1M
76
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Grok 3 Mini
21.7
Qwen2.5-1M
79.9
Grok 3 Mini
74.1
Qwen2.5-1M
82
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Grok 3 Mini
39.7
Qwen2.5-1M
84
Qwen2.5-1M is ahead overall, 43 to 23. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SimpleQA, where the scores are 21.7% and 81%.
Qwen2.5-1M has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 82 versus 74.1. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen2.5-1M has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 76 versus 41.5. Grok 3 Mini stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Qwen2.5-1M has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 84 versus 39.7. Inside this category, AIME 2024 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Qwen2.5-1M has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 79.9 versus 21.7. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.