Skip to main content

Model comparison

Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) vs Ling 2.6 Flash

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Margin
16.6pts
← winning
InclusionAI
43.87/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) #48 (Supported); Ling 2.6 Flash #154 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) and Ling 2.6 Flash share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning); 7 to Ling 2.6 Flash.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
11
Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) only
2
Ling 2.6 Flash only
7
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) and Ling 2.6 Flash is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) has the larger context window at 2M, compared with 262K for Ling 2.6 Flash.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) and Ling 2.6 Flash
CategoryGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)ΔLing 2.6 Flash
CodingGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapLing 2.6 Flash27.0
KnowledgeGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapLing 2.6 Flash59.0
Inst. FollowingGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapLing 2.6 Flash57.0

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Ling 2.6 FlashComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableLing 2.6 FlashNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableLing 2.6 Flash209.5 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableLing 2.6 Flash1.07 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)2MLing 2.6 Flash262KGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Ling 2.6 FlashResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 93.3%86%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
GDPval-AASource 2.2%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 545Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 2.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Ling 2.6 FlashResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 1.20%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 44.2%27.1%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
SciCodeSource 27%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 25.3%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Ling 2.6 FlashResult
AA-LCRSource 68.0%25.0%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
CritPtSource 2.9%0.0%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Ling 2.6 FlashResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 30.6%14.1%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 85.3%59.3%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 17.6%6.2%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -28.7%-65.7%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 25.3%15.4%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 72.4%95.8%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
GPQASource 59%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Ling 2.6 FlashResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 63.3%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Ling 2.6 FlashResult
AA-IFBenchSource 52.7%57.4%Ling 2.6 Flash leads
IFBenchSource 57%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) and Ling 2.6 Flash on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) and Ling 2.6 Flash today?

Ling 2.6 Flash: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.