Skip to main content

Model comparison

Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) vs Trinity-Large-Thinking

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Margin
8.2pts
← winning
52.32/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) #48 (Supported); Trinity-Large-Thinking #100 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) and Trinity-Large-Thinking share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning); 8 to Trinity-Large-Thinking.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
11
Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) only
2
Trinity-Large-Thinking only
8
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) and Trinity-Large-Thinking is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) has the larger context window at 2M, compared with 512K for Trinity-Large-Thinking.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Trinity-Large-ThinkingComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableTrinity-Large-Thinking$0.25 input / $0.9 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableTrinity-Large-ThinkingNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableTrinity-Large-ThinkingNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)2MTrinity-Large-Thinking512KGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Trinity-Large-ThinkingResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 93.3%90.1%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
Gert LabsSource 32.55%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 2.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 554Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Trinity-Large-ThinkingResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 1.20%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 44.2%36.1%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
SWE-bench Verified*Source 63.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Trinity-Large-ThinkingResult
AA-LCRSource 68.0%33.0%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
CritPtSource 2.9%0.9%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Trinity-Large-ThinkingResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 30.6%24.5%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 85.3%75.2%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 17.6%14.7%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -28.7%-44.2%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 25.3%22.8%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 72.4%86.6%Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) leads
GPQA-DSource 76.3%Not comparable
MMLU-Pro (Arcee)Source 83.4%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Trinity-Large-ThinkingResult
AIME25 (Arcee)Source 96.3%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Trinity-Large-ThinkingResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 63.3%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1165Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGrok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning)Trinity-Large-ThinkingResult
AA-IFBenchSource 52.7%56.3%Trinity-Large-Thinking leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) and Trinity-Large-Thinking on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Grok 4.1 Fast (Reasoning) and Trinity-Large-Thinking today?

Trinity-Large-Thinking: $0.25 input / $0.90 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.