Skip to main content

Grok 4.20 vs Grok 4.5

Data verified

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Verdict

Grok 4.5 leads for most workloads.

  • Grok 4.20 offers ~4× the context window — choose it for very long inputs.

Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.

Grok 4.20

68

VS

Grok 4.5

75

0 categoriesvs2 categories

Pick Grok 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Grok 4.20 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 2M context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

BenchmarkGrok 4.20ΔGrok 4.5
Agentic47.1 36.283.3
Coding61.1 3.664.7
Reasoning53.3
Multimodal70.1

Operational Comparison

Grok 4.20

Grok 4.5

Price (per 1M tokens)

$2 / $6

$2 / $6

Speed

233 t/s

N/A

Latency (first answer)

10.33s

N/A

Context Window

2M

500K

Quick Verdict

Pick Grok 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Grok 4.20 only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 2M context window.

Grok 4.5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 75 to 68. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Grok 4.5's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 83.3 against 47.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 47.1% to 83.3%.

Grok 4.20 gives you the larger context window at 2M, compared with 500K for Grok 4.5.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Grok 4.20 or Grok 4.5?

Grok 4.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 75 to 68. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 47.1% and 83.3%.

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.20 or Grok 4.5?

Grok 4.5 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 64.7 versus 61.1. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Grok 4.20 or Grok 4.5?

Grok 4.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 83.3 versus 47.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 8, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.