Skip to main content

Grok 4.5 vs Kimi K2.6

Data verified

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Verdict

Grok 4.5 leads for most workloads by a narrow margin.

Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.

Grok 4.5

75

VS

Kimi K2.6

75

1 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Grok 4.5 unranked · Kimi K2.6 #13

Treat this as a split decision. Grok 4.5 makes more sense if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 500K context window; Kimi K2.6 is the better fit if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

BenchmarkGrok 4.5ΔKimi K2.6
Agentic83.3 9.873.5
Coding64.7 7.972.6
Knowledge42.2
Math94.6
Multimodal79.8

Operational Comparison

Grok 4.5

Kimi K2.6

Price (per 1M tokens)

$2 / $6

$0.95 / $4

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (first answer)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

500K

256K

Quick Verdict

Treat this as a split decision. Grok 4.5 makes more sense if agentic is the priority or you need the larger 500K context window; Kimi K2.6 is the better fit if coding is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Grok 4.5 and Kimi K2.6 finish on the same provisional overall score, so this is less about a single winner and more about where the edge shows up. The provisional headline says tie; the benchmark table is where the real choice happens.

Grok 4.5 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.95 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens for Kimi K2.6. Grok 4.5 gives you the larger context window at 500K, compared with 256K for Kimi K2.6.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Grok 4.5 or Kimi K2.6?

Grok 4.5 and Kimi K2.6 are tied on the provisional overall score, so the right pick depends on which category matters most for your use case.

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.5 or Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72.6 versus 64.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Grok 4.5 or Kimi K2.6?

Grok 4.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 83.3 versus 73.5. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Grok 4.5
API / mo$6,000
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Kimi K2.6
API / mo$3,713
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even326M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 8, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.