Model comparison
Grok 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B
Head-to-head evidence from 13 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Evidence parity. Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B share 13 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 14 results are unique to Grok 4.5; 3 to Nemotron 3 Nano 30B.
Updated July 14, 2026- Shared results
- 13
- Grok 4.5 only
- 14
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B only
- 3
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 13 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Grok 4.5 is priced at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B. Grok 4.5 has the larger context window at 500K, compared with 32K for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Grok 4.5 | Δ | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Grok 4.583.3 | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured |
| Coding | Grok 4.564.7 | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano 30BNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Grok 4.5 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Grok 4.5$2 input / $6 output | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B$0 input / $0 output | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Grok 4.5Not available | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B152 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Grok 4.5Not available | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B1.90 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Grok 4.5500K | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B32K | Grok 4.5 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic11 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 83.3% | — | Not comparable |
| deepSweSource | 53% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 45.7% | 2.0% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 51.9% | 0.0% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 1539 | 484 | Grok 4.5 leads |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 1324 | — | Not comparable |
| AA AutomationBenchSource | 51.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | 40.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | 13.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 32.6% | — | Not comparable |
| Tau2-TelecomSource | — | 40.9% | Not comparable |
Coding8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench ProSource | 64.7% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | 78% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 83.3% | — | Not comparable |
| cursorBench32Source | 66.7% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 72.5% | 14.4% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 54.1% | 29.6% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Source | 81.6% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | — | 13.6% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 53.8% | 14.2% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 93.1% | 75.7% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| AA-HLESource | 40.3% | 10.2% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 26.4% | -51.6% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 52.1% | 17.1% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 53.5% | 82.9% | Grok 4.5 leads |
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 71.1% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B today?
Grok 4.5: $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens Nemotron 3 Nano 30B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.