Grok 4.5 vs Qwen2.5-1M
Head-to-head comparison across 0benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verdict
Grok 4.5 leads for most workloads.
Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.
Grok 4.5
75
Qwen2.5-1M
--
Benchmark data for Grok 4.5 and Qwen2.5-1M is coming soon on BenchLM.
Category Radar
Head-to-Head by Category
Operational Comparison
Grok 4.5
Qwen2.5-1M
$2 / $6
$0 / $0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
500K
1M
Quick Verdict
Benchmark data for Grok 4.5 and Qwen2.5-1M is coming soon on BenchLM.
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Qwen2.5-1M yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
Grok 4.5 is priced at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen2.5-1M. Qwen2.5-1M has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 500K for Grok 4.5.
Benchmark Deep Dive
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Grok 4.5 and Qwen2.5-1M on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Grok 4.5 and Qwen2.5-1M today?
Grok 4.5: $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens Qwen2.5-1M: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.