Model comparison
Grok 4.5 vs Qwen3.5 Flash
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Grok 4.5 #7 (Supported); Qwen3.5 Flash #134 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Grok 4.5 and Qwen3.5 Flash share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 27 results are unique to Grok 4.5; 2 to Qwen3.5 Flash.
Updated July 18, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Grok 4.5 only
- 27
- Qwen3.5 Flash only
- 2
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Grok 4.5 and Qwen3.5 Flash is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Grok 4.5 is priced at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3.5 Flash. Qwen3.5 Flash has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 500K for Grok 4.5.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Grok 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Flash | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Grok 4.5$2 input / $6 output | Qwen3.5 Flash$0.1 input / $0.4 output | Qwen3.5 Flash has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Grok 4.5Not available | Qwen3.5 FlashNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Grok 4.5Not available | Qwen3.5 FlashNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Grok 4.5500K | Qwen3.5 Flash1M | Qwen3.5 Flash lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic11 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 83.3% | — | Not comparable |
| deepSweSource | 53% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 45.7% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 51.7% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 1535 | — | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 1323 | — | Not comparable |
| AA AutomationBenchSource | 51.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | 40.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | 13.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 32.6% | — | Not comparable |
| aaTerminalBench21Source | 81.6% | — | Not comparable |
Coding6 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Qwen3.5 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 53.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 93.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 40.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 26.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 52.1% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 53.5% | — | Not comparable |
Math2 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Grok 4.5 and Qwen3.5 Flash on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Grok 4.5 and Qwen3.5 Flash today?
Grok 4.5: $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens Qwen3.5 Flash: $0.10 input / $0.40 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.