Model comparison
Grok 4.5 vs Trinity-Large-Thinking
Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Grok 4.5 #7 (Supported); Trinity-Large-Thinking #100 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Grok 4.5 and Trinity-Large-Thinking share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 15 results are unique to Grok 4.5; 7 to Trinity-Large-Thinking.
Updated July 18, 2026- Shared results
- 12
- Grok 4.5 only
- 15
- Trinity-Large-Thinking only
- 7
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Grok 4.5 and Trinity-Large-Thinking is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Grok 4.5 is priced at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.25 input / $0.90 output per 1M tokens for Trinity-Large-Thinking. Trinity-Large-Thinking has the larger context window at 512K, compared with 500K for Grok 4.5.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Grok 4.5 | Δ | Trinity-Large-Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Grok 4.583.3 | MarginNo overlap | Trinity-Large-ThinkingNot measured |
| Coding | Grok 4.564.7 | MarginNo overlap | Trinity-Large-ThinkingNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Grok 4.5 | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Grok 4.5$2 input / $6 output | Trinity-Large-Thinking$0.25 input / $0.9 output | Trinity-Large-Thinking has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Grok 4.5Not available | Trinity-Large-ThinkingNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Grok 4.5Not available | Trinity-Large-ThinkingNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Grok 4.5500K | Trinity-Large-Thinking512K | Trinity-Large-Thinking lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic13 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 83.3% | — | Not comparable |
| deepSweSource | 53% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 45.7% | — | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | 51.7% | 2.7% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 1535 | 554 | Grok 4.5 leads |
| AA BriefcaseSource | 1323 | — | Not comparable |
| AA AutomationBenchSource | 51.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | 40.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | 13.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | 32.6% | — | Not comparable |
| aaTerminalBench21Source | 81.6% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 90.1% | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | — | 32.55% | Not comparable |
Coding7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench ProSource | 64.7% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | 78% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 83.3% | — | Not comparable |
| cursorBench32Source | 66.7% | — | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | 72.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 54.1% | 36.1% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| SWE-bench Verified*Source | — | 63.2% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge8 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 53.8% | 24.5% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 93.1% | 75.2% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| AA-HLESource | 40.3% | 14.7% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 26.4% | -44.2% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 52.1% | 22.8% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 53.5% | 86.6% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 76.3% | Not comparable |
| MMLU-Pro (Arcee)Source | — | 83.4% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME25 (Arcee)Source | — | 96.3% | Not comparable |
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 56.3% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Grok 4.5 and Trinity-Large-Thinking on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Grok 4.5 and Trinity-Large-Thinking today?
Grok 4.5: $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens Trinity-Large-Thinking: $0.25 input / $0.90 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.