Skip to main content

Model comparison

Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) vs Muse Spark

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 13 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Margin
14.5pts
winning →
71.04/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) #76 (Supported); Muse Spark #13 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) and Muse Spark share 13 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning); 26 to Muse Spark.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
13
Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) only
0
Muse Spark only
26
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) and Muse Spark is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 13 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) has the larger context window at 2M, compared with 262K for Muse Spark.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) and Muse Spark
CategoryGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)ΔMuse Spark
AgenticGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapMuse Spark59.0
CodingGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapMuse Spark67.8
ReasoningGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapMuse Spark42.5
KnowledgeGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapMuse Spark50.4
MathGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapMuse Spark32.9
MultimodalGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapMuse Spark82.5

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Muse SparkComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableMuse SparkNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableMuse SparkNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableMuse SparkNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)2MMuse Spark262KGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning) lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Muse SparkResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 65.8%91.5%Muse Spark leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 59%Not comparable
DeepSearchQASource 74.8%Not comparable
CyberGymSource 43.5%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 63.8%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 28.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 32.2%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1144Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Muse SparkResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 0.00%19.67%Muse Spark leads
AA-SciCodeSource 44.2%51.5%Muse Spark leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 77.4%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 52.4%Not comparable
LiveCodeBench ProSource 80.0%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 58.6%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Muse SparkResult
AA-LCRSource 64.7%69.7%Muse Spark leads
CritPtSource 2.9%11.3%Muse Spark leads
ARC-AGI-2Source 42.5%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Muse SparkResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 27.4%43.1%Muse Spark leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 84.7%88.4%Muse Spark leads
AA-HLESource 17.0%39.9%Muse Spark leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -28.4%4.1%Muse Spark leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 22.6%44.6%Muse Spark leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 66.0%73.2%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
GPQA-DSource 89.5%Not comparable
HLESource 50.4%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 42.8%Not comparable
HealthBench HardSource 42.8%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (Text)Source 52.6%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Muse SparkResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 39.000%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 14.600%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Muse SparkResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 61.8%80.5%Muse Spark leads
CharXivSource 86.4%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 80.4%Not comparable
ERQASource 64.7%Not comparable
SimpleVQASource 71.3%Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource 84.1%Not comparable
ZeroBenchSource 33.0%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source 78.4%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Muse SparkResult
AA-IFBenchSource 50.5%75.9%Muse Spark leads
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Can I compare Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) and Muse Spark on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.