Skip to main content

Model comparison

Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

Margin
12.4pts
← winning
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) #83 (Supported); Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B #159 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning); 17 to Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.

Updated July 27, 2026
Shared results
12
Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) only
1
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
17
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) has the larger context window at 2M, compared with 256K for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
CategoryGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)ΔNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
CodingGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B32.0
KnowledgeGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3
MultimodalGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3
Inst. FollowingGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not measuredMarginNo overlapNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B74.2

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)2MNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B256KGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning) lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 65.8%45.3%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
OSWorldSource 47.4%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 465Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 0.00%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 44.2%27.8%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
SciCodeSource 32%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 13.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BResult
AA-LCRSource 64.7%35.7%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
CritPtSource 2.9%0.0%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 27.4%14.9%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 84.7%46.9%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-HLESource 17.0%5.3%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -28.4%-56.0%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 22.6%14.8%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 66.0%83.1%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
MMLU-ProSource 77.3%Not comparable
GPQASource 72.2%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 72.2%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BResult
AIME 2025Source 82.1%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 61.8%53.2%Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) leads
MMMUSource 70.8%Not comparable
MMLongBench-DocSource 57.5%Not comparable
CharXivSource 76.3%Not comparable
ScreenSpot ProSource 57.8%Not comparable
Video-MME (w/o subtitle)Source 72.2%Not comparable
AI2D_TESTSource 88.5%Not comparable
RefCOCO (avg)Source 90.5%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 50.5%63.2%Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B leads
IFBenchSource 74.2%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B today?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.