Model comparison

Grok Build 0.1 vs Laguna S 2.1

Data verified July 21, 2026

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.

Grok Build 0.1

xAI

N/A

No comparison

Laguna S 2.1

Poolside

N/A

0 category wins0 category wins

Evidence parity. Grok Build 0.1 and Laguna S 2.1 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Grok Build 0.1; 6 to Laguna S 2.1.

Updated July 21, 2026

Shared results: 0
Grok Build 0.1 only: 1
Laguna S 2.1 only: 6
Comparable categories: 0 / 8

Benchmark data for Grok Build 0.1 and Laguna S 2.1 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Grok Build 0.1 is priced at $1.00 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.10 input / $0.20 output per 1M tokens for Laguna S 2.1. Laguna S 2.1 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Grok Build 0.1.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

Metric	Grok Build 0.1	Laguna S 2.1	Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens	Grok Build 0.1$1 input / $2 output	Laguna S 2.1$0.1 input / $0.2 output	Laguna S 2.1 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per second	Grok Build 0.1Not available	Laguna S 2.1Not available	A complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first token	Grok Build 0.1Not available	Laguna S 2.1Not available	A complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokens	Grok Build 0.1256K	Laguna S 2.11M	Laguna S 2.1 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic

3 benchmarks

Benchmark	Grok Build 0.1	Laguna S 2.1	Result
Gert LabsSource	49.15%	—	Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source	—	70.2%	Not comparable
Toolathlon-VerifiedSource	—	49.7%	Not comparable

Coding

4 benchmarks

Benchmark	Grok Build 0.1	Laguna S 2.1	Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source	—	70.2%	Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource	—	78.5%	Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource	—	59.4%	Not comparable
deepSweSource	—	40.4%	Not comparable

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Grok Build 0.1 and Laguna S 2.1 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Grok Build 0.1 and Laguna S 2.1 today?

Grok Build 0.1: $1.00 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens Laguna S 2.1: $0.10 input / $0.20 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

xAI Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.