Model comparison
Grok Build 0.1 vs Step 3.7 Flash
Head-to-head evidence from 15 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
BenchAlign evidence: Grok Build 0.1 not scored; Step 3.7 Flash estimated. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Grok Build 0.1 and Step 3.7 Flash share 15 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Grok Build 0.1; 15 to Step 3.7 Flash.
Updated July 16, 2026- Shared results
- 15
- Grok Build 0.1 only
- 0
- Step 3.7 Flash only
- 15
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Grok Build 0.1 and Step 3.7 Flash is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 15 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Grok Build 0.1 is priced at $1.00 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.20 input / $1.15 output per 1M tokens for Step 3.7 Flash.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Grok Build 0.1 | Δ | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Grok Build 0.1Not measured | MarginNo overlap | Step 3.7 Flash66.4 |
| Coding | Grok Build 0.1Not measured | MarginNo overlap | Step 3.7 Flash56.3 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Grok Build 0.1 | Step 3.7 Flash | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Grok Build 0.1$1 input / $2 output | Step 3.7 Flash$0.2 input / $1.15 output | Step 3.7 Flash has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Grok Build 0.1Not available | Step 3.7 FlashNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Grok Build 0.1Not available | Step 3.7 FlashNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Grok Build 0.1256K | Step 3.7 Flash256K | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Step 3.7 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gert LabsSource | 49.15% | 51.57% | Step 3.7 Flash leads |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | 28.0% | 21.5% | Grok Build 0.1 leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 35.6% | 25.9% | Grok Build 0.1 leads |
| GDPval-AASource | 1211 | 1017 | Grok Build 0.1 leads |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 59.5% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 75.8% | Not comparable |
| DeepSearchQASource | — | 92.8% | Not comparable |
| ToolathlonSource | — | 49.5% | Not comparable |
| Claw-EvalSource | — | 67.1% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/ toolsSource | — | 47.2% | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 98.5% | Not comparable |
| APEX-Agents-AASource | — | 14.8% | Not comparable |
Coding5 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Step 3.7 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 39.8% | 30.3% | Grok Build 0.1 leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 89.5% | 80.9% | Grok Build 0.1 leads |
| AA-HLESource | 36.0% | 19.9% | Grok Build 0.1 leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 7.4% | -37.5% | Grok Build 0.1 leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 51.4% | 25.4% | Grok Build 0.1 leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 90.5% | 84.4% | Step 3.7 Flash leads |
Multimodal4 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Step 3.7 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | — | 67.3% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Grok Build 0.1 and Step 3.7 Flash on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Grok Build 0.1 and Step 3.7 Flash today?
Grok Build 0.1: $1.00 input / $2.00 output per 1M tokens Step 3.7 Flash: $0.20 input / $1.15 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.