Coding
Like-for-like- Grok Code Fast 1
- 70.8
- MiMo-V2-Pro
- 78.0
- Weighted basis
- 1 vs 1 rows
- Reading
- MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Model comparison
Grok Code Fast 1 vs MiMo-V2-Pro
Updated August 1, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.
20 confirmed releases in the last 30 daysSee provider release alerts
MiMo-V2-Pro has the higher public score, 66.75 versus 37.69, and the 90% score intervals do not overlap.
1 results are shared. Category rows based on different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
Which one for your work
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro leads on the same 1 weighted benchmark row.
Confidence: limited
Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro has the larger documented context window.
Confidence: documented
Show secondary and unsupported calls
Agentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
No shared weighted benchmark basis supports a winner.
Confidence: limited
Chat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Cache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: rate-fallback
Repository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
What is actually comparable
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
1 Shared
3 MiMo-V2-Pro only
- Shared results
- 1
- Grok Code Fast 1 only
- 0
- MiMo-V2-Pro only
- 3
- Like-for-like categories
- 1 / 8
Category results, on a stated basis
Each row states whether both averages use the same weighted benchmark set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner in this template.
Agentic
Not comparable- Grok Code Fast 1
- Not measured
- MiMo-V2-Pro
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Reasoning
Not comparable- Grok Code Fast 1
- Not measured
- MiMo-V2-Pro
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Knowledge
Not comparable- Grok Code Fast 1
- Not measured
- MiMo-V2-Pro
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Math
Not comparable- Grok Code Fast 1
- Not measured
- MiMo-V2-Pro
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multilingual
Not comparable- Grok Code Fast 1
- Not measured
- MiMo-V2-Pro
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multimodal
Not comparable- Grok Code Fast 1
- Not measured
- MiMo-V2-Pro
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Instruction following
Not comparable- Grok Code Fast 1
- Not measured
- MiMo-V2-Pro
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
| Category | Grok Code Fast 1 | MiMo-V2-Pro | Weighted basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 70.8 | 78.0 | Like-for-like1 vs 1 rows | MiMo-V2-Pro leads |
| Agentic | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Reasoning | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Knowledge | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Math | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Multimodal | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Instruction following | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
Shape of the matched evidence
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
Too few matched category axes support a radar. The ruled list below shows only shared benchmark results; positions use each benchmark’s normalized display scale when available.
SWE-bench Verified
Coding
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
Chat turn
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
- Grok Code Fast 1
- $0.00095
- Fits in one request
- MiMo-V2-Pro
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
MiMo-V2-Pro has no comparable published API token rate.
Repository review
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
- Grok Code Fast 1
- $0.0145
- Fits in one request
- MiMo-V2-Pro
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
MiMo-V2-Pro has no comparable published API token rate.
Cache-heavy agent loop
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
- Grok Code Fast 1
- $0.059
- Fits in one request
- Cached input priced at the published list-input rate
- MiMo-V2-Pro
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
Grok Code Fast 1 has no published cached-input rate, so cached tokens use its listed input rate. MiMo-V2-Pro has no comparable published API token rate.
Specification differences
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
SpecificationGrok Code Fast 1MiMo-V2-Pro
Context window
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
Grok Code Fast 1
256K
MiMo-V2-Pro
1M
API model ID
Grok Code Fast 1
Not sourced
MiMo-V2-Pro
Not sourced
Cached-input rate
A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
Grok Code Fast 1
Not published
MiMo-V2-Pro
No comparable hosted API rate
Documented inputs
Grok Code Fast 1
Not sourced
MiMo-V2-Pro
Not sourced
Documented outputs
Grok Code Fast 1
Not sourced
MiMo-V2-Pro
Not sourced
Provider availability
Grok Code Fast 1
Not sourced
MiMo-V2-Pro
Not sourced
Reasoning profile
Grok Code Fast 1
Non-Reasoning
MiMo-V2-Pro
Reasoning
Weight access
Grok Code Fast 1
Proprietary
MiMo-V2-Pro
Proprietary
License
Grok Code Fast 1
Proprietary
MiMo-V2-Pro
Proprietary
Release date
Grok Code Fast 1
2025-08-28
MiMo-V2-Pro
2026-03-18
If you already use one of these models
- Deployment change
- The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
- Quality signal
- MiMo-V2-Pro has the higher public score, 66.75 versus 37.69, and the 90% score intervals do not overlap.
- Workload cost
- A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
- Context tradeoff
- MiMo-V2-Pro has the larger documented window (1M).
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
Benchmark evidence
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Browse raw public benchmark evidence4 rows
Agentic
Coding
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Grok Code Fast 1 or MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro has the higher public score, 66.75 versus 37.69, and the 90% score intervals do not overlap. That is the clearest overall quality signal in the current public data.
Which is better for coding, Grok Code Fast 1 or MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro leads the like-for-like coding comparison across 1 shared weighted benchmark row.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Grok Code Fast 1 or MiMo-V2-Pro?
The published evidence does not provide a shared weighted agentic tasks basis for both models, so BenchLM does not name a agentic tasks winner.
Which costs less, Grok Code Fast 1 or MiMo-V2-Pro?
Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.
Which has the larger context window, Grok Code Fast 1 or MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro has the larger documented context window: 1M, compared with 256K.
Related comparisons
Last updated August 1, 2026
Watch Grok Code Fast 1 vs MiMo-V2-Pro
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.