Capability
66.8/100
field median 57.3
#23 of 214 ranked models
Superseded.Xiaomi has newer models in this line:MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Model profile · Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro scores 66.8 out of 100 and ranks #23 of 214. This profile shows 4 source-displayable benchmark rows; its strongest eligible category is Coding at #21. No comparable first-party API price is published in the catalog.
Data as of August 2, 2026 · How the score is built
Strongest published evidence
Coding ranks #21. Particularly well-suited for software development and code generation tasks.
Validate before choosing
4 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. No comparable first-party API token rate is published.
Decision snapshot
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Price
Not listed
input median $1
No comparable first-party hosted token rate
Speed
Not measured
field median 108 tok/s
Time to first token not measured
Context
1Mtokens
field median 256,000
Reported for this model; direct source link not stored
Capability shape
Each axis shows percentile within that category’s eligible cohort. The comparison outline is the median of the six nearest public-score peers; a collapsed vertex means the category is not rank-eligible.
MiMo-V2-Pro category percentile values
- AgenticNot eligible
- Coding84th percentile
- ReasoningNot eligible
- KnowledgeNot eligible
- MathNot eligible
- MultilingualNot eligible
- MultimodalNot eligible
- Instruction followingNot eligible
The dashed outline is median of 6 nearest peers.
Eligible category ranks
- AgenticNot ranked
- Coding#21/129
- ReasoningNot ranked
- KnowledgeNot ranked
- MathNot ranked
- MultilingualNot ranked
- MultimodalNot ranked
- Inst. FollowingNot ranked
Top decileTop quartileMid-fieldNot eligible
How much of this is verified
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
- Agentic3/3 verified
- Coding0/1 verified
- ReasoningNot measured
- KnowledgeNot measured
- MathNot measured
- MultilingualNot measured
- MultimodalNot measured
- Inst. FollowingNot measured
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured
Spec sheet
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
- API model ID
- Not published
- Context window
- 1M
- Maximum output
- Not sourced yet
- Knowledge cutoff
- Not sourced yet
- Input modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Output modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Parameters
- Not disclosed by the provider
- Availability
- Not sourced yet
- Cloud regions
- Not tracked yet
- Lifecycle
- Superseded
- API capabilities
- Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
- Prompt caching
- Not documented in the pricing record
- Self-host
- Weights are not published
- Rate limits
- Not tracked yet
Category score record
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticRank Not rankedWeight 22%3 benchmarksVerified | 86.7 | Not ranked | Not available | 22% | 3 benchmarks | Verified |
| CodingRank #21 of 129Percentile 84thWeight 20%1 benchmarkReported | 61.2 | #21 of 129 | 84th | 20% | 1 benchmark | Reported |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
Benchmark ledger
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
Coding1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSoftware Engineering Benchmark Verified | Score78% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 96% | Gap18 behind | WeightWeighted 16% | Reported |
Agentic3 rows
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claw-Eval | Score57.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Ornith-1.0-397B · 77.1% | Gap19.3 behind | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
| Gert LabsGert Labs Composite Game Benchmark | Score36.68% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 4.8 · 72.97% | Gap36.3 behind | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
| ResearchClawBench | Score15.3% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 4.8 · 21.1% | Gap5.8 behind | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
Lineage
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Mar 18, 2026 · you are here
MiMo-V2-ProScore 66.8 · Price not listed
Apr 22, 2026
MiMo-V2.5-ProScore 69.2 · Price not listed
Base entry
How to read this profile
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
MiMo-V2-Pro ranks #23 of 214 on the public leaderboard with a score of 66.75/100. Its source-verified position is #20 of 103.
MiMo-V2-Pro is a proprietary model with a 1M context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
Provisional secondary exact-value snapshot based on repeated launch-window secondary coverage. Revisit when Xiaomi publishes a primary benchmark table for MiMo-V2-Pro.
4 of 376 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Its strongest eligible category is Coding at #21. particularly well-suited for software development and code generation tasks.
Radar
Full release historyMiMo-V2-Pro release history
MiMo-V2-Pro and MiMo-V2-Omni released
Xiaomi · Model release
Source confirmed
Frequently asked questions
How does MiMo-V2-Pro perform overall in AI benchmarks?
MiMo-V2-Pro ranks #23 out of 214 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 66.75/100. Its evidence status is Supported, and this profile shows 4 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.
Is MiMo-V2-Pro good for coding and programming?
MiMo-V2-Pro ranks #21 out of 129 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 61.2/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.
Is MiMo-V2-Pro good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
MiMo-V2-Pro has source-displayable benchmark coverage for agentic tool use and computer tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Does MiMo-V2-Pro have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
No. MiMo-V2-Pro currently has 15 source-displayable rows across 376 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
What is the context window size of MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro has a reported context window of 1M in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.
Last updated August 2, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Watch MiMo-V2-Pro in the weekly brief
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.