Model comparison
Holo2-235B-A22B vs Ling 2.6 Flash
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Holo2-235B-A22B unranked (Not scored); Ling 2.6 Flash #154 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Holo2-235B-A22B and Ling 2.6 Flash share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Holo2-235B-A22B; 18 to Ling 2.6 Flash.
Updated July 21, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Holo2-235B-A22B only
- 1
- Ling 2.6 Flash only
- 18
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Holo2-235B-A22B and Ling 2.6 Flash is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Holo2-235B-A22B | Ling 2.6 Flash | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Holo2-235B-A22BNot available | Ling 2.6 FlashNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Holo2-235B-A22BNot available | Ling 2.6 Flash209.5 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Holo2-235B-A22BNot available | Ling 2.6 Flash1.07 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Holo2-235B-A22B262K | Ling 2.6 Flash262K | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic4 benchmarks
Coding3 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Holo2-235B-A22B | Ling 2.6 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | — | 14.1% | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | — | 59% | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | — | 59.3% | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | — | 6.2% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | -65.7% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 15.4% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 95.8% | Not comparable |
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Holo2-235B-A22B | Ling 2.6 Flash | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| ScreenSpot ProSource | 70.6% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Holo2-235B-A22B and Ling 2.6 Flash on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Holo2-235B-A22B and Ling 2.6 Flash today?
Ling 2.6 Flash: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.