Agentic
Not comparable- Holo2-30B-A3B
- Not ranked
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- 37.7
- Supported · #126/151
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 0 vs 11 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Holo2-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Updated September 4, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.
Decision reading
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
1 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
Share or export
Which one for your work
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus has the larger documented context window.
Confidence: documented
Show secondary and unsupported calls
Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Not enough matched evidence
Holo2-30B-A3B is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.
Confidence: limited
Agentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
Holo2-30B-A3B is not ranked on the public lane for agentic, so no winner is named for agentic.
Confidence: limited
Chat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Cache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Repository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
What is actually comparable
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
1 Shared
51 Qwen3.7 Plus only
- Shared results
- 1
- Holo2-30B-A3B only
- 0
- Qwen3.7 Plus only
- 51
- Like-for-like categories
- 0 / 8
Category results, on a stated basis
Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.
Coding
Not comparable- Holo2-30B-A3B
- Not ranked
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- 53.1
- Estimated · #51/183
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 0 vs 7 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Reasoning
Not comparable- Holo2-30B-A3B
- Not ranked
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- 73.7
- Unranked · 3 rankable rows
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Knowledge
Not comparable- Holo2-30B-A3B
- Not ranked
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- 56.8
- Estimated · #50/181
- Basis
- BenchAlign lane · 0 vs 7 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Math
Not comparable- Holo2-30B-A3B
- Not ranked
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- 78.3
- Unranked · 3 rankable rows
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multilingual
Not comparable- Holo2-30B-A3B
- Not ranked
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- 78.9
- #3/12
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multimodal
Not comparable- Holo2-30B-A3B
- Not ranked
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- 72.5
- #18/48
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 2 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Instruction following
Not comparable- Holo2-30B-A3B
- Not ranked
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- 91.1
- #17/120
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
| Category | Holo2-30B-A3B | Qwen3.7 Plus | Basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Not ranked | 37.7Supported · #126/151 | Not comparableBenchAlign lane · 0 vs 11 public rows | Not comparable |
| Coding | Not ranked | 53.1Estimated · #51/183 | Not comparableBenchAlign lane · 0 vs 7 public rows | Not comparable |
| Reasoning | Not ranked | 73.7Unranked · 3 rankable rows | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Knowledge | Not ranked | 56.8Estimated · #50/181 | Not comparableBenchAlign lane · 0 vs 7 public rows | Not comparable |
| Math | Not ranked | 78.3Unranked · 3 rankable rows | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not ranked | 78.9#3/12 | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Multimodal | Not ranked | 72.5#18/48 | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 2 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Instruction following | Not ranked | 91.1#17/120 | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 1 weighted rows | Not comparable |
Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.
Shape of the matched evidence
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
A shared-evidence shape is not available.
BenchLM does not draw a radar or infer missing axes when the matched evidence is too sparse.
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
Chat turn
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
- Holo2-30B-A3B
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
Holo2-30B-A3B has no comparable published API token rate. Qwen3.7 Plus has no comparable published API token rate.
Repository review
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
- Holo2-30B-A3B
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
Holo2-30B-A3B has no comparable published API token rate. Qwen3.7 Plus has no comparable published API token rate.
Cache-heavy agent loop
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
- Holo2-30B-A3B
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
- Qwen3.7 Plus
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
Holo2-30B-A3B has no comparable published API token rate. Qwen3.7 Plus has no comparable published API token rate.
Specification differences
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
SpecificationHolo2-30B-A3BQwen3.7 Plus
Context window
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
Holo2-30B-A3B
262K
Qwen3.7 Plus
1M
API model ID
Holo2-30B-A3B
Not sourced
Qwen3.7 Plus
Not sourced
Cached-input rate
A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
Holo2-30B-A3B
No comparable hosted API rate
Qwen3.7 Plus
No comparable hosted API rate
Documented inputs
Holo2-30B-A3B
Not sourced
Qwen3.7 Plus
Not sourced
Documented outputs
Holo2-30B-A3B
Not sourced
Qwen3.7 Plus
Not sourced
Provider availability
Holo2-30B-A3B
Not sourced
Qwen3.7 Plus
Not sourced
Reasoning profile
Holo2-30B-A3B
Non-Reasoning
Qwen3.7 Plus
Reasoning
Weight access
Holo2-30B-A3B
Open Weight
Qwen3.7 Plus
Proprietary
License
Holo2-30B-A3B
Open Weight
Qwen3.7 Plus
Proprietary
Release date
Holo2-30B-A3B
Not sourced
Qwen3.7 Plus
2026-06-03
If you already use one of these models
- Deployment change
- The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
- Quality signal
- At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
- Workload cost
- A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
- Context tradeoff
- Qwen3.7 Plus has the larger documented window (1M).
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
Benchmark evidence
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Browse raw public benchmark evidence52 rows
Agentic
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus70.3%SourceNot directly comparable
QwenClawBench
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus61.8%SourceNot directly comparable
Claw-Eval
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus62.7%SourceNot directly comparable
BFCL v4
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus72.9%SourceNot directly comparable
MCP Atlas
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus73.2%SourceNot directly comparable
VITA-Bench
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus45.6%SourceNot directly comparable
DeepPlanning
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus62.3%SourceNot directly comparable
OSWorld-Verified
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus73.3%SourceNot directly comparable
AndroidWorld
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus81.0%SourceNot directly comparable
OSWorld 2.0
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus2.8%SourceNot directly comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals)
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus52.8%SourceNot directly comparable
Coding
Terminal-Bench 2.0
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus70.3%SourceNot directly comparable
SWE-bench Verified
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus77.7%SourceNot directly comparable
SWE-bench Pro
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus57.6%SourceNot directly comparable
SWE Multilingual
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus75.8%SourceNot directly comparable
NL2Repo
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus41.1%SourceNot directly comparable
SciCode
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus51.3%SourceNot directly comparable
LiveCodeBench
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus89.6%SourceNot directly comparable
Reasoning
Knowledge
GPQA
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus90.3%SourceNot directly comparable
GPQA-D
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus90.3%SourceNot directly comparable
HLE
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus34.7%SourceNot directly comparable
MMLU-Pro
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus88.5%SourceNot directly comparable
MMLU-Redux
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus94.5%SourceNot directly comparable
SuperGPQA
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus71.4%SourceNot directly comparable
MMMLU
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus89.0%SourceNot directly comparable
Math
Multilingual
MMLU-ProX
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus85.4%SourceNot directly comparable
NOVA-63
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus58.8%SourceNot directly comparable
INCLUDE
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus83.0%SourceNot directly comparable
MAXIFE
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus88.8%SourceNot directly comparable
PolyMath
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus84.0%SourceNot directly comparable
Multimodal
ScreenSpot Pro
Holo2-30B-A3B66.1%SourceQwen3.7 Plus79.0%SourceQwen3.7 Plus leads this result
MMMU-Pro
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus79%SourceNot directly comparable
MathVision
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus90.3%SourceNot directly comparable
CharXiv
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus85.9%SourceNot directly comparable
ERQA
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus69.8%SourceNot directly comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus71.0%SourceNot directly comparable
SimpleVQA
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus81.7%SourceNot directly comparable
MMSearch-Plus
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus41.4%SourceNot directly comparable
RealWorldQA
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus86.9%SourceNot directly comparable
OmniDocBench 1.5
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus91.4%SourceNot directly comparable
OCRBench V2
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus70.7%SourceNot directly comparable
ODINW13
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus51.1%SourceNot directly comparable
Video-MME (with subtitle)
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus88.0%SourceNot directly comparable
VideoMMMU
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus85.4%SourceNot directly comparable
MLVU (M-Avg)
Holo2-30B-A3B—Qwen3.7 Plus87.4%SourceNot directly comparable
Instruction following
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Holo2-30B-A3B or Qwen3.7 Plus?
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.
Which is better for coding, Holo2-30B-A3B or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Holo2-30B-A3B is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Holo2-30B-A3B or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Holo2-30B-A3B is not ranked on the public lane for agentic tasks, so no winner is named for agentic tasks.
Which costs less, Holo2-30B-A3B or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.
Which has the larger context window, Holo2-30B-A3B or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus has the larger documented context window: 1M, compared with 262K.
Related comparisons
Last updated September 4, 2026
Watch Holo2-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.7 Plus
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.