Skip to main content

Model comparison

Holo2-4B vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
H Company
N/A
No comparison
Moonshot AI
54.03/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Holo2-4B unranked (Not scored); Kimi K2.7 Code #92 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Holo2-4B and Kimi K2.7 Code share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Holo2-4B; 23 to Kimi K2.7 Code.

Updated July 27, 2026
Shared results
0
Holo2-4B only
1
Kimi K2.7 Code only
23
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Holo2-4B and Kimi K2.7 Code is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Holo2-4B has the larger context window at 262K, compared with 256K for Kimi K2.7 Code.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricHolo2-4BKimi K2.7 CodeComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensHolo2-4BNot availableKimi K2.7 Code$0.95 input / $4 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondHolo2-4BNot availableKimi K2.7 CodeNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenHolo2-4BNot availableKimi K2.7 CodeNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensHolo2-4B262KKimi K2.7 Code256KHolo2-4B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkHolo2-4BKimi K2.7 CodeResult
Kimi Claw 24/7Source 46.9%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource 76%Not comparable
MCP Mark VerifiedSource 81.1%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 29.6%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 90.1%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 34.3%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1186Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkHolo2-4BKimi K2.7 CodeResult
Kimi Code Bench v2Source 62.0%Not comparable
ProgramBenchSource 53.6%Not comparable
MLS-Bench LiteSource 35.1%Not comparable
cursorBench32Source 49.7%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 60.8%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 47.5%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkHolo2-4BKimi K2.7 CodeResult
AA-LCRSource 66.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 10.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkHolo2-4BKimi K2.7 CodeResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 42.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 89.6%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 32.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -10.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 38.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.3%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkHolo2-4BKimi K2.7 CodeResult
ScreenSpot ProSource 57.2%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1300Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkHolo2-4BKimi K2.7 CodeResult
AA-IFBenchSource 63.1%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Holo2-4B and Kimi K2.7 Code on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Holo2-4B and Kimi K2.7 Code today?

Kimi K2.7 Code: $0.95 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Holo2-4B
API / mo$0
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Kimi K2.7 Code
API / mo$3,713
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even326M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 27, 2026

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.