Skip to main content

Model comparison

Holo3.1-35B-A3B-FP8 vs Mercury 2

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
N/A
No comparison
Inception
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Holo3.1-35B-A3B-FP8 unranked (Not scored); Mercury 2 #105 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Holo3.1-35B-A3B-FP8 and Mercury 2 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Holo3.1-35B-A3B-FP8; 0 to Mercury 2.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
Holo3.1-35B-A3B-FP8 only
0
Mercury 2 only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-FP8 and Mercury 2 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-FP8 and Mercury 2 yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

Mercury 2 is priced at $0.25 input / $0.75 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-FP8. Holo3.1-35B-A3B-FP8 has the larger context window at 262K, compared with 128K for Mercury 2.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricHolo3.1-35B-A3B-FP8Mercury 2Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensHolo3.1-35B-A3B-FP8$0 input / $0 outputMercury 2$0.25 input / $0.75 outputHolo3.1-35B-A3B-FP8 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondHolo3.1-35B-A3B-FP8Not availableMercury 2789 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenHolo3.1-35B-A3B-FP8Not availableMercury 23.88 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensHolo3.1-35B-A3B-FP8262KMercury 2128KHolo3.1-35B-A3B-FP8 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Holo3.1-35B-A3B-FP8 and Mercury 2 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-FP8 and Mercury 2 today?

Holo3.1-35B-A3B-FP8: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Mercury 2: $0.25 input / $0.75 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.