Skip to main content

Model comparison

Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF vs Llama 4 Scout

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
No comparison
39.87/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF unranked (Not scored); Llama 4 Scout #174 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF and Llama 4 Scout share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF; 18 to Llama 4 Scout.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF only
0
Llama 4 Scout only
18
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF and Llama 4 Scout is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window at 10M, compared with 262K for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFLlama 4 ScoutComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF$0 input / $0 outputLlama 4 Scout$0 input / $0 outputListed prices are equal.
Generation speedtokens per secondHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFNot availableLlama 4 Scout128 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFNot availableLlama 4 Scout0.70 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF262KLlama 4 Scout10MLlama 4 Scout lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFLlama 4 ScoutResult
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.1%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 15.5%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 90Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFLlama 4 ScoutResult
AA Coding IndexSource 8.2%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 17.0%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFLlama 4 ScoutResult
AA-LCRSource 25.8%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFLlama 4 ScoutResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 10.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 58.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -52.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 14.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 78.3%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFLlama 4 ScoutResult
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 0.000%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFLlama 4 ScoutResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 52.9%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 780Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFLlama 4 ScoutResult
AA-IFBenchSource 39.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF and Llama 4 Scout on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF and Llama 4 Scout today?

Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Llama 4 Scout: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF
API / mo$0
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Llama 4 Scout
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$2,278
Break-even
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.