Skip to main content

Model comparison

Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF vs MiMo-V2.5

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
No comparison
Xiaomi
58.62/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF unranked (Not scored); MiMo-V2.5 #62 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF and MiMo-V2.5 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF; 11 to MiMo-V2.5.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF only
0
MiMo-V2.5 only
11
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF and MiMo-V2.5 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

MiMo-V2.5 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFMiMo-V2.5Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF$0 input / $0 outputMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFNot availableMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFNot availableMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF262KMiMo-V2.51MMiMo-V2.5 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFMiMo-V2.5Result
Claw-EvalSource 62.3%Not comparable
MM-ClawBenchSource 23.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 46.89%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 16.9%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFMiMo-V2.5Result
SWE-bench ProSource 56.1%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFMiMo-V2.5Result
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source 87.7%Not comparable
CharXivSource 81%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 77.9%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1291Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF and MiMo-V2.5 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF and MiMo-V2.5 today?

Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens MiMo-V2.5: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.