Model comparison
Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF vs o3-mini
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF unranked (Not scored); o3-mini #136 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF and o3-mini share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF; 10 to o3-mini.
Updated July 22, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF only
- 0
- o3-mini only
- 10
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF and o3-mini is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
o3-mini is priced at $1.10 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF. Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF has the larger context window at 262K, compared with 200K for o3-mini.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF | o3-mini | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF$0 input / $0 output | o3-mini$1.1 input / $4.4 output | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFNot available | o3-mini160 tok/s | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFNot available | o3-mini7.12 s | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF262K | o3-mini200K | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF | o3-mini | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | — | 28.7% | Not comparable |
Coding2 benchmarks
Knowledge5 benchmarks
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF | o3-mini | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME 2024Source | — | 87.3% | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF | o3-mini | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFEvalSource | — | 93.9% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF and o3-mini on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF and o3-mini today?
Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens o3-mini: $1.10 input / $4.40 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.