Agentic
Not comparable- Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
- Not measured
- Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Updated August 28, 2026. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty. They are not guarantees for a specific workload.
Decision reading
The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict. Use the documented cost, context, and runtime rows instead.
0 results are shared. Category rows based on different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
Which one for your work
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
No workload recommendation clears the current evidence threshold.
Use the matched evidence, workload costs, and sourced specifications below instead of treating a point score as a universal answer.
Show secondary and unsupported calls
Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Not enough matched evidence
No shared weighted benchmark basis supports a winner.
Confidence: limited
Agentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
No shared weighted benchmark basis supports a winner.
Confidence: limited
Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
No clear pick
The documented context windows are equal.
Confidence: documented
Chat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Cache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
Repository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
Confidence: listed-rates
What is actually comparable
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
3 Ling 3.0 Flash Fin only
- Shared results
- 0
- Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 only
- 0
- Ling 3.0 Flash Fin only
- 3
- Like-for-like categories
- 0 / 8
Category results, on a stated basis
Each row states whether both averages use the same weighted benchmark set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner in this template.
Coding
Not comparable- Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
- Not measured
- Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Reasoning
Not comparable- Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
- Not measured
- Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Knowledge
Not comparable- Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
- Not measured
- Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Math
Not comparable- Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
- Not measured
- Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multilingual
Not comparable- Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
- Not measured
- Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multimodal
Not comparable- Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
- Not measured
- Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Instruction following
Not comparable- Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
- Not measured
- Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- Not measured
- Weighted basis
- 0 vs 0 rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
| Category | Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 | Ling 3.0 Flash Fin | Weighted basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Coding | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Reasoning | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Knowledge | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Math | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Multimodal | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
| Instruction following | Not measured | Not measured | Not comparable0 vs 0 rows | Not comparable |
Shape of the matched evidence
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
A shared-evidence shape is not available.
BenchLM does not draw a radar or infer missing axes when the matched evidence is too sparse.
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
Chat turn
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
- Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 has no comparable published API token rate. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin has no comparable published API token rate.
Repository review
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
- Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 has no comparable published API token rate. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin has no comparable published API token rate.
Cache-heavy agent loop
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
- Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
- Self-hosted; infrastructure cost varies
- Fits in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
- Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 has no comparable published API token rate. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin has no comparable published API token rate.
Specification differences
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
SpecificationHolo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Context window
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
262K
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
API model ID
Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
Not sourced
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
inclusionai/ling-3.0-flash-fin
Vercel AI Gateway availabilityCached-input rate
A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
No comparable hosted API rate
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
No comparable hosted API rate
Vercel AI Gateway availabilityDocumented inputs
Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
Not sourced
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Not sourced
Documented outputs
Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
Not sourced
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Not sourced
Provider availability
Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
Not sourced
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Not sourced
Reasoning profile
Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
Non-Reasoning
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Reasoning
Weight access
Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
Open Weight
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Proprietary
License
Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
Open Weight
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Proprietary
Release date
Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4
2026-06-01
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
2026-08-28
If you already use one of these models
- Deployment change
- The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
- Quality signal
- The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict.
- Workload cost
- A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
- Context tradeoff
- Both models list 262K.
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
Benchmark evidence
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Browse raw public benchmark evidence3 rows
Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?
The public evidence has no benchmark result shared by both models, so it does not support a quality verdict. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.
Which is better for coding, Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?
The published evidence does not provide a shared weighted coding basis for both models, so BenchLM does not name a coding winner.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?
The published evidence does not provide a shared weighted agentic tasks basis for both models, so BenchLM does not name a agentic tasks winner.
Which costs less, Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?
Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.
Which has the larger context window, Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?
Both models list the same context window, 262K.
Related comparisons
Last updated August 28, 2026
Watch Holo3.1-35B-A3B-NVFP4 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.