Skip to main content

Model comparison

Holo3.1-35B-A3B vs MiniMax M2.5

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
N/A
No comparison
59.52/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Holo3.1-35B-A3B unranked (Not scored); MiniMax M2.5 #55 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Holo3.1-35B-A3B and MiniMax M2.5 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Holo3.1-35B-A3B; 1 to MiniMax M2.5.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
Holo3.1-35B-A3B only
1
MiniMax M2.5 only
1
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Holo3.1-35B-A3B and MiniMax M2.5 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Holo3.1-35B-A3B is priced at $0.25 input / $1.80 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens for MiniMax M2.5. Holo3.1-35B-A3B has the larger context window at 262K, compared with 128K for MiniMax M2.5.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricHolo3.1-35B-A3BMiniMax M2.5Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensHolo3.1-35B-A3B$0.25 input / $1.8 outputMiniMax M2.5$0.3 input / $1.2 outputMiniMax M2.5 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondHolo3.1-35B-A3BNot availableMiniMax M2.546 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenHolo3.1-35B-A3BNot availableMiniMax M2.52.12 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensHolo3.1-35B-A3B262KMiniMax M2.5128KHolo3.1-35B-A3B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3BMiniMax M2.5Result
AndroidWorldSource 79.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkHolo3.1-35B-A3BMiniMax M2.5Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 14.85%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Holo3.1-35B-A3B and MiniMax M2.5 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Holo3.1-35B-A3B and MiniMax M2.5 today?

Holo3.1-35B-A3B: $0.25 input / $1.80 output per 1M tokens MiniMax M2.5: $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.